Laserfiche WebLink
"dividing of land into three or more parcels." This is also the typical threshold for a major subdivision in <br />most local ordinances. <br />Likewise, developments or improvements involving river -dependent commercial and industrial uses are <br />also exempt from the provisions of this rule, as these types of development typically take place on large <br />sites that are unsuitable for open space preservation or public access. <br />Subpart3. Project information. In order to assure an adequate evaluation of the impacts of proposed <br />development or redevelopment within the MRCCA on the natural resource assets of the corridor, the <br />local government will be required to obtain adequate data from the project developer. This subpart <br />specifies that this information must be provided and reviewed by the local government prior to project <br />authorization. The specifics of these requirements are provided in proposed Minn. R. 6106.0080, <br />subpart 6. <br />Subpart4. Design standards. Local ordinances are required to include design standards and other tools <br />that are intended to achieve or heighten protection or restoration of primary conservation areas — those <br />areas containing key resources and featuring important to the character of the MRCCA. These design <br />standards and tools include incentives for alternative design standards such as conservation design. <br />Incentives are intended to encourage developers to employ conservation design or other innovative <br />development methods, such as transfer of development rights from sensitive to less sensitive lands, <br />which will afford greater protection to the public assets within the MRCCA. <br />• Protection of primary conservation areas during development and redevelopment. Because of <br />the importance of the remaining primary conservation areas within the MRCCA, local <br />governments are required to protect those areas as open space. The proposed rule recognizes, <br />however, that in some circumstances protection of a primary conservation area may unduly <br />burden a developer, particularly where the primary conservation area encompasses the <br />majority of the parcel. This subpart, therefore, sets protection thresholds or a maximum <br />percentage of land in a parcel that must be protected as open space to conserve primary <br />conservation areas. The percentage of land that must be conserved as open space is tied to the <br />conditions in and nature of each district. (See Table 2.) <br />Table 2: Percentage of Open Space by District <br />Corridor District <br />Maximum % of Open <br />Space Required <br />Rationale for Maximum <br />Rural and Open Space (CA-ROS) <br />50% <br />District includes the majority of remaining <br />primary conservation areas and potentially <br />developable land. <br />River Neighborhood (CA -RN) <br />20% <br />District is largely developed; open space <br />percentage is similar to existing open space <br />patterns. <br />River Towns and Crossings (RTC) <br />10% <br />District is largely developed or already <br />preserved as public parkland. <br />Separated from River (SR) <br />10%* <br />District is largely developed or already <br />preserved as public parkland; fewer <br />64 <br />