My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:27:24 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 1:32:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
poration or LLC as well as information on the <br />president and secretary of the corporation. If <br />the entity is an LLC, it may list the name of the <br />manager(s). These valuable sites can be used <br />to confirm that the entity exists and provide <br />addresses needed for proper notice. <br />If a corporation or LLC is involuntarily <br />dissolved, the officers and directors may be <br />personally liable for the violation. lithe reg- <br />istered agent cannot be served, most states <br />allow service on the secretary of state as the <br />default registered agent. <br />NOTICES OF VIOLATION <br />The zoning administrator must be familiar with <br />what the zoning code requires for notices ofvi- <br />olation. If there is a procedure set forth in the <br />code, it must be strictly followed, otherwise a <br />motion to dismiss by the defendant would be <br />proper due to the lack of due process. <br />The zoning official should also determine <br />whether notice is required by the code. If so, <br />who is entitled to serve the notice? What infor- <br />mation must the notice contain? How must the <br />notice be served? <br />Even if notice is not required, sending <br />notice is a helpful step to take because most <br />people will comply once they are educated <br />about the problem (e.g., failure to obtain a <br />zoning certificate of compliance). If it is re- <br />quired, notice should be sent individually to <br />each responsible party (e.g., an owner and a <br />tenant or spouses) to the place required by <br />the code, often a last known address. <br />When multiple parties are responsible, <br />everyone should receive a notice. This increas- <br />es the odds of compliance if at least one of <br />the responsible parties responds to the notice <br />of violation. <br />If the code requires that the notice con- <br />tain specific information, it must be in the no- <br />tice. The zoning administrator can always add <br />more information but never less than what is <br />required. This usually includes the location's <br />address, date of the inspection, the nature of <br />the violation, the section of the code that was <br />violated, date for compliance, and the process <br />for an appeal. <br />If the code requires that the notice <br />be served in a specific way, that procedure <br />must be followed. Frequently, notice may <br />be served by regular mail, certified mail, in <br />person, by posting it on the property in ques- <br />tion, or by notice in the newspaper if the <br />responsible party cannot be found. A corpo- <br />ration or LLC can be notified properly by serv- <br />Clear definitions and standards for outdoor storage are <br />important for interpreting zoning violations. <br />ing the registered agent. It is very important <br />to consult the code to be sure the chosen <br />method is allowed. Failure to serve the notice <br />properly can result in a motion to dismiss <br />and will delay compliance. <br />TYPES OF EVIDENCE <br />The most important evidence in a zoning <br />enforcement case are the observations of the <br />zoning administrator or inspector. This is why <br />it is very important that the zoning adminis- <br />trator or inspector gathers the evidence in a <br />systematic way. Good notes are crucial so they <br />can be used to refresh the witness's testimony <br />regarding statements made by the defendant <br />to the witness. Admissions by responsible <br />parties are important in proving the case. <br />Defendants often make admissions dur- <br />ing conversations or while exchanging emails <br />or texts with the inspector. These are admis- <br />sible against the defendant as long as the <br />inspector can testify about when the admis- <br />sion was made, who was present, and what <br />was said. <br />Photographs of the zoning violation can <br />be used to corroborate the observations of <br />the witness. Aerial photographs are frequently <br />used in zoning cases, especially when it is <br />alleged by the defendant that there is a legal <br />nonconforming use. The photographs may <br />show that the initial legal use of the property <br />was expanded and changed over time, thereby <br />cancelling the legal nonconforming use of the <br />property. For example, an auto junkyard may <br />have been legal when it was created as a busi- <br />ness, but if the area where the salvage mate- <br />rial is located has tripled in size since that <br />time, the legal nonconforming use may have <br />been extinguished. <br />A certified copy of the local government's <br />zoning map can be used to prove the zoning <br />classification of the area in question. <br />If business records are used as evidence, <br />the inspector or another witness must estab- <br />lish that they were kept in the ordinary course <br />of business and if it was the regular course of <br />such business to make such memorandum <br />or record at the time of such act, transaction, <br />occurrence, or event, or within a reasonable <br />time thereafter. <br />It is permissible to visit a business "un- <br />dercover," that is, pretending to be a patron. <br />For example, ifa person is repairing vehicles <br />at a single-family residence, and that is not a <br />permitted home occupation, it is legal to ask <br />the violator to perform a service on a vehicle, <br />such as an oil change, and then use that as <br />evidence of the illegal activity. <br />One of my favorite examples of under- <br />cover activity dealt with a salon that was <br />illegally using the basement of a building for <br />spa treatment rooms. The zoning certificate of <br />occupancy did not cover that space because <br />it was not protected by a sprinkler system. <br />The owner denied using the space and said <br />that all business was being conducted at the <br />street level. The village sent a female inspec- <br />tor into the business to get a pedicure, which <br />ZONINGPRACTICE i.i7 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.