My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:27:24 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 1:32:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
family home that is converted into a three -unit <br />apartment building. Multifamily buildings <br />are generally not permitted in a single-family <br />residential area unless there is a legal non- <br />conforming use. The first step is to determine <br />if the use was ever legal. Older buildings con- <br />verted before the zoning ordinance took effect <br />may be legal and grandfathered in under the <br />zoning code. <br />If the building has been illegally convert- <br />ed to a use that is not permitted, a complaint <br />can be filed, not just for the zoning violation, <br />but also for any building code violations. Typi- <br />cally, when a building is converted improperly, <br />the owner does not obtain building permits <br />for the construction and often violates the <br />building code by doing improper electrical or <br />plumbing work. These types of buildings may <br />also violate the fire code when people are liv- <br />ing illegally in the attic and the basement. An <br />emergency condemnation under the property <br />maintenance code may be necessary if the <br />occupancy constitutes an immediate hazard <br />to the residents. <br />Once there is compliance, how does the <br />local government assure there is no reconver- <br />sion? One possibility is to record the notice of <br />violation with the recorder of deeds so that a <br />Establishing Clear Discontinuance <br />Provisions <br />This example from Woodridge, Illinois, <br />shows how a zoning ordinance can <br />clarify when a nonconforming use is con- <br />0 <br />sidered to be discontinued: <br />A nonconforming building, <br />structure or portion thereof, all <br />or substantially all of which is <br />designed or intended for a use <br />which is not permitted in the dis- <br />trict in which it is located, and in <br />which the use has ceased by dis- <br />continuance or abandonment on <br />the effective date hereof or there- <br />after is abandoned and remains <br />unoccupied, or is not used for a <br />continuous period of one year, <br />shall not thereafter be occupied <br />or used, except by a use which <br />conforms to the use regulations of <br />the district in which it is located <br />09-9-z-5)- <br />future purchaser knows that the building is a <br />single-family residence. Once the defendant <br />complies, a notice of compliance should be <br />recorded. Anyone who buys the property after <br />that cannot claim that they did not know the <br />property was a single-family residence be- <br />cause it will appear on a title search at the real <br />estate closing. <br />Legal Nonconforming Uses <br />In a city or county that contains older build- <br />ings, both commercial and residential, <br />defendants will try to argue that their use is <br />"grandfathered in." While the burden of proof <br />in most jurisdictions is on the defendant to <br />show that the use was legal when it began, <br />it is important to have systems in place that <br />can retrieve documents regarding the property <br />decades later. Many of these cases go back <br />decades, after three or more major revisions <br />of the zoning code. If the zoning administra- <br />tor cannot access the necessary information <br />to show that the use was never legal or that <br />the use was illegally expanded or intensified, <br />it will hamper negotiations to resolve the is- <br />sue. At times, the language used in the older <br />zoning code is vague, which leads to disagree- <br />ments over interpretation. Rather than rushing <br />into litigation, the zoning administrator, with <br />the proper legal advice, needs to honestly <br />review whether the ambiguity in the old ordi- <br />nance will make it unlikely that a court action <br />will succeed. A rule of legal construction re- <br />quires that any ambiguity in an ordinance be <br />resolved against the party that wrote it (i.e., <br />the local government). <br />Most zoning ordinances have a provision <br />whereby a legal nonconforming use is aban- <br />doned if the structure is empty for a set period <br />of time. The owner will usually counter with an <br />argument that he or she always had an intent <br />to resume the use and did not truly abandon <br />the property. This becomes an issue of fact <br />that the city or county needs to rebut. This is <br />why casual conversations with owners can <br />become critical evidence. These encounters, <br />need to be documented so that the inspector <br />can refresh his or her recollection months or <br />even years later. <br />CHOOSING THE PROPER COURT VENUE <br />Whenever an enforcement action is brought <br />against a defendant, there needs to be a deci- <br />sion as to whether the case should be brought <br />as a simple complaint versus an action in the <br />chancery division of the circuit court. Most <br />Many zoning codes prohibit parking vehicles within front- or <br />side -yard setbacks. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 1.1.7 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.