Laserfiche WebLink
Adjusting dollar limits <br /> <br /> Inflation has had an effect upon cities beyond a <br />mere exertion of upward thrust on budgets and <br />expenditures. The legislature has quite consistent- <br />ly included within authorizing and enabling legis- <br />lation, limitations expressed in dollars. These dol- <br />lar limitations, while quite appropriate at the time <br />of enactment, become progressively more con- <br />stricting with advancing inflation. Therefore, the <br />League recommends that certain of the more <br />important and often used authorizing statutes <br />containing dollar limitations be modified by ap- <br />plication of a constant dollar index figure cal- <br />culated from the year of enactment, to the limita- <br />tion set out in the act. The modification should be <br />made so that when statutes relating to other sta- <br />tutes are modified, the dollar limitations are <br />adjusted in a uniform manner. <br /> <br />Campaign financing and disclosure <br /> <br /> Campaigns and elections to local office are the <br />most important single contact' between voters <br />and representative local government. On the <br />whole, the general public has more confidence in <br />the election process at the city '.level because the <br />candidates are usually well 'known (especially <br />in smaller cities) and campaign activities are <br />more visible than at other levels of government. <br />Moreover, city candidates running for offices <br />which are for the most part IoW paid, part-time <br />and non-partisan, are generally motivated by a <br />sense of civic responsibility. <br /> <br /> The League perceives no need for new laws <br />in the area of local campaigns although it could <br />support legislation which would simplify the <br />election process or would encourage rather than <br />discourage qualified candidates for local office. <br /> <br />The League supports the following: <br /> <br />1. Extending income tax credits for con- <br /> tributions to city election campaigns; <br /> <br />Eliminating any distinction between types <br />of campaign committees in cities over <br />20,000 and making the candidate or his <br />or her designees responsible for all funds <br />spent on behalf of the candidate, in order <br />to make the disclosure requirements ef- <br />fective. <br /> <br />The League opposes the following: <br /> <br />A state-mandated requirement of candi- <br />dates for city office to file statements of <br />economic interest because it is most likely <br />to discourage many qualified candidates <br />from seeking or continuing in office. <br /> <br />Campaign contribution limits or report- <br />ing requirements in cities with less than <br />20,000 population which are made un- <br />necessary by conflict of interest rules <br />governing the actions of election officials <br />in all cities. <br /> <br />Collateral for depositories <br /> <br /> Depositories now are required to collateralize <br />the deposits of local government in the amount <br />of 110%. Local depositories now serve as a valuable <br />market for bond issues of local school districts, <br />counties and cities. If the amount of collateral <br />required is reduced, this market will also be re- <br />duced, making it more difficult to sell municipal <br />bonds. Also, if the collateral is purchased by a <br />state agency on behalf of all depositories, the exist- <br />ing cooperative arrangement between local deposi- <br />tories and local governments will be destroyed <br />and local governments may deposit their funds <br />in larger depositories located outside of the com- <br />munity. Therefore, the League recommends that <br />the legislature keep the collateral requirements <br />for depositories at their present levels a~nd opposes <br />any reduction, and also opposes the purchase of <br />collateral by any agency other than the depository. <br /> <br />Election day registration <br /> <br />Eliminating outdated and probably uncon- <br />stitutional expenditure limits for city <br />campaigns; <br /> <br />Giving cities over 20,000 the authority to <br />establish limits on campaign contributions <br />from individuals and organizations; <br /> <br />Requiring reports in cities over 20,000 of <br />each contribution of $100 or more from <br />a single source; <br /> <br /> The principal purpose of the Minnesota system <br />of election day registration is to improve and in- <br />crease eligible voter access to voting. Unfortunate- <br />ly, the system has become more unworkable es- <br />pecially in the larger and fast growing cities, where <br />individuals are not using the pre-election day regis- <br />tration and where there are a growing number of <br />multiple registrations adding to the costs of elec- <br />tions and to the frustrations of the voters. For <br />these r.easons, the League believes that registration <br />should take place before election day. The fol- <br />lowing steps would improve the current system. <br /> <br />-13 - <br /> <br /> <br />