Laserfiche WebLink
maintain and improve the emergency services <br />network, the League suggests the following guide- <br />lines: <br /> <br />The current statutory requirements for am- <br />bulance vehicles, equipment and atten- <br />dants' training should remain in the sta- <br />tutes as minimum requirements. Appro- <br />priate amendments, however, should allow <br />quick response vehicles to respond to <br />emergency situations. <br /> <br />With increasing interest in paramedic <br />services, the League supports the pro- <br />viding of easily accessible training on a <br />statewide basis at minimum cost in order <br />to meet appropriate qualifications. <br /> <br />While the League supports the continuing <br />development of a systems approach to <br />emergency medical services, we believe that <br />local governments should be closely in- <br />volved in their planning and implementa- <br />tion. The League recognizes the need for <br />qualified, trained individuals in emergen- <br />cy medical service and in support of this <br />recognized need, recommends that both <br />initial and on-going training be made avail- <br />able through an in-service process which <br />will meet appropriate qualifications. State <br />grants and aids should be available to en- <br />able all cities to have access to adequate <br />emergency medical service. <br /> <br />Cities agree that alternative transportation <br />strategies that are less costly than full <br />ambulance services should be developed. <br /> <br />Fire codes <br /> <br /> One of the more rapidly evolving legal arenas <br />recently has been the extent to which the public, <br />via state or local governments, is responsible for <br />the safety of buildings through inspections and <br />code enforcement. There seems to be general agree- <br />ment that state government should be responsP <br />ble for enforcement of the uniform fire code, <br />which applies to existing buildings, in la'rge facili- <br />ties which are open to the public, whether they <br />are located in cities or townships. The League <br />would support legislation which clarifies the <br />responsibility of the state to inspect such public <br />facilities as schools, hotels, Iodginghouses, hospi- <br />tals and nursing homes, provided that the state is <br />clearly responsible for enforcement and inspec- <br />tion, whether or not it contracts with local units <br /> <br />of government to perform the actual inspection. <br />However, the legislation should permit cities to <br />enact more stringent fire safety codes for these <br />facilities, as well as for other buildings. <br /> <br /> When a city chooses to enact more stringent <br />fire safety codes, and to enforce these more strin- <br />gent codes by inspection, the city should realize <br />that it may be liable for any failure to inspect <br />and to enforce the code. <br /> <br /> When a city does not enact more stringent <br />fire safety codes, the state should be responsible <br />for inspection and enforcement of the fire code, on <br />a case-by-case basis, when requested by any poli- <br />tical subdivision (including a school district) or a <br />hopsital, unless the city clearly agrees to accept <br />the responsibility for the enforcement of the fire <br />code. <br /> <br /> It is equally important to focus on preventin'g <br />emergencies or potential emergency situations <br />through incorporating improved protection fea- <br />tures into new bulling construction, especially in <br />high-risk areas or in certain high-risk buildings. <br />Evidence indicates that if certain protective fea- <br />tures were incorporated, the lives and property of <br />occupants would be better protected and local <br />public safety services would be better able to cope <br />with emergencies at the present level of service, <br />without adding to the general property tax burden. <br />The League recommends that the uniform state <br />building code be amended to permit any city to <br />enact ordinances to require fire protection and <br />building security features that exceed those set <br />forth in the code. <br /> <br />Handicapped provisions of the state building code <br /> <br /> The League recommends that the handicapped <br />provisions of the state building code be made <br />mandatory statewide for new buildings with en- <br />forcement as follows. Any new building to which <br />these provisions apply should be designed to con- <br />for~ to these provisions by an architect, engineer <br />or contractor. If the city, or county if the new <br />building is outside a city, does not have a building <br />official, the architect, engineer or contractor shall <br />also inspect the building and certify to the city, <br />or county if located outside of a city, that the <br />new building has been constructed in compliance <br />with these provisions. This certification must be <br />completed before any city or county may issue <br />a certificate of occupancy for the building or <br />before the' inspection process is completed if no <br />certificate of occupancy is required. <br /> <br />-19- <br /> <br /> <br />