Laserfiche WebLink
5.03: Consider Draft 2017-2018 Work Plan <br /> City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of this case is to <br /> consider the Draft 2017-2018 Work Plan for the Environmental Policy Board. He stated that the <br /> EPB had identified four elements in February for inclusion in a Work Plan and those items were <br /> presented to the City Council at a joint meeting in February. He stated that the Draft Work Plan <br /> has been formatted to mirror that of the City Council's Strategic Plan as well as the Work Plan of <br /> the Planning Commission. <br /> Board Member Valentine stated that City Planner Anders id a great job compiling the <br /> information. <br /> Chairperson Stodola stated that he also likes this form ork Plan. <br /> City Planner Anderson stated that this is the tem sed by the ouncil. <br /> City Councilmember LeTourneau stated that t evious year the Board created the Statement of <br /> Purpose and thought the development of the Wo an was,a great logical next step. He noted <br /> the staff time that is shown and ask if this list o items might be too big of a commitment for <br /> staff to accomplish in the next year. <br /> City Planner Anderson noted that ther e m rs oNstaat could work on the items on the <br /> list and advised that there may also be interns coming on board sn that could assist with some <br /> of the items. He stated that this Work Plan is designed for 2017 anc018 and rather than remove <br /> items, he would prefer for the Board to prioritize the items on the Work Plan. He noted that the <br /> items on the Work Plan are not in any particular order and therefore could be prioritized. <br /> L. M_ <br /> Chairperson Stodola asked if the Work Plan could r the next two years,noting that some items <br /> would be ongoin <br /> City Ater Anderson n that ork Plan can be designed for multiple years. He stated <br /> that the Cit unci works three-ye Strategic Plan and the Planning Commission recently <br /> developed a -year Work He cognized that there are challenges with the limited <br /> number of time oard or C ission meets and the regular business items the groups must <br /> also consider. <br /> Board Member Anderson commented that the items on the Work Plan do not appear to be things <br /> that can be accomplished quickly. The example was given that even if an organics recycling <br /> program is developed,there would still need to be follow-up to ensure that the program is working <br /> and to review the results. <br /> City Planner Anderson stated that the Work Plan can be 2017-2019 with the intention that the <br /> document can be revisited and amended as time goes on. <br /> City Councilmember LeTourneau appreciated the comments made tonight and noted that he will <br /> share the discussion with the City Council when the Council reviews the Work Plan. He stated <br />