Laserfiche WebLink
SECOND cUT CRITERIA - <br />The corridors to be evaluated using the second cut criteria are shown <br />on Figure 1. The second cut criteria have some numerical <br />measures using available data. It should be emphasized, however, <br />that the evaluation measures are indicators only and are not <br />purported to be precise forecast volumes· The relative accuracy <br />is sufficient for ranking the corridors. Only available data <br />summaries, not new data were used in the evaluation. <br /> <br />The Second Cut Criteria and their measures are: <br /> <br />Market by Travel Shed <br />A. Forecasted Year 2000 person trip demand through the corridor <br /> of CBD bound travel <br /> Forecasted Year 2000 work trip demand through the corridor <br /> of CBD bound travel <br /> Forecasted Year 2000 work trip transit-usage through the <br /> corridor of CBD bound travel <br /> Present Transit usage through the corridor <br /> <br />Market by Subregion ~ <br />A. Forecasted Year 2000 person trip demand-Subregion to CBD <br />B. Forecasted Year 2000 person trip transit demand-Subregion to <br /> CBD <br />C. Forecasted Year 2000 work trip demand-Subregion to CBD <br />D. Forecasted Year 2000 trip transit demand-Subregion to CBD <br /> <br />3. Congestion forecasted in the corridor on the Metro Highway System <br /> <br />The evaluation rating and the measure for each criterion is <br /> summarized on Table 3. <br /> <br />The High and Medium ranked corridors from this evaluation were <br />considered to have met the second set of criteria. The seven highest <br />ranked corridors selected for the Third Cut Evaluation are: <br /> <br />A. St. Paul West and Minneapolis East which is the same corridor <br /> <br />C. Minneapolis South <br /> <br />D. Minneapolis West/Southwest <br /> <br />E. Minneapolis Northwest <br /> <br />F. Minneapolis Northeast <br /> <br />G. Minneapolis North <br /> <br />H. St. Paul North/Northeast <br /> <br />It is emphasized that when each corridor is qualified for the Third <br />Cut Evaluation that it has equal status with all of the qualified <br />corridors irrespective of the SeCond Cut numerical ranking. <br /> <br /> <br />