Laserfiche WebLink
The fore~asts of need and basic input data fo~such a corridor would <br />be similar to the other corridors. However, the level of detail to <br />document feasibility in terms of design and costs might be less <br />precise. <br /> <br />The Minneapolis South corridor has a relatively lower rating because <br />of the roadway and rail R/W, limited development or redevelopment <br />potential and the fact that a higher type transit (preferential bus <br />treatment) is already operating in the corridor. <br /> <br />The Minneapolis North corridor does not rate as high in the areas of <br />available background studies, development potential inside the <br />central city, and the operational similarity of this corridor to the <br />Northwest and Northeast sectors from the CBD. Since either the <br />Northwest or Northeast Minneapolis corridors covers much of the area <br />served by the North corridor, the feasibility of transit to southern <br />Anoka County will be evaluated even though the North corridor is not <br />studied as a separate project. <br /> <br /> <br />