Laserfiche WebLink
~h'd[._risky't~ modi'~Cy :fhe 'g~6C'esSl,k~. ,:! .... ,j. a'ny re~son:t 'J' '?;'gf t~e.Bureau <br />were req'b}m'e'd'to ~k",~,.d.the local .review period b_yond:>the 6 :weeks al l,.otted, <br />extensive ~evision~ v~ould have to be made %o allow for ~he delayed receipt of <br />~'~h~u's forms from the census.offices and the reduced amount of time available <br />to process the data' <br /> <br />In light of the time currently allowed for the full local review process, <br />as I have described above, I am doubtful that there would be any appreciable <br />gain in the qualJty of census data for a particular municipality as a result <br />of extending local review. Further, there would definitely be significant <br />cost increases, but more importantly, the ability to process the census results <br />within the legally mandated time frame would be in jeopardy. On balance~ ! <br />have concluded that the risks and costs involved in keeping the offices open <br />across the country to accommodate.further extension of the local review period <br />far outweigh any potential improvements from extending the local review activity. <br />I can assure your constituents that, depending on the nature and timing of the <br />problems reported and the overall impact on the census count for a particular '- <br />area, the office in a specific area-will remain open until the Census Bureau <br />is convinced that the counts are satisfactory. <br /> <br />The problems of ZIP codes being shared by different political jurisdictions or <br />of post office names often being that of a larger neighboring j.urisdiction are <br />not unusual but actually fairly common. The Census Bureau is aware of this <br />and has developed procedures to ensure that people are counted where they <br />actually reside regardless of their mailing address. <br /> <br />In most parts of the Country, typically the suburban and rural areas, the <br />address list that was used to l~be] the census-questionnaireswas developed <br />by census enumerators-who canvassed the areas-in a-.systematic~manner~_ They <br />inquired at each household-for an adequate mail~ng address~_ ~I? the_residents_ <br />gave a post office name and ZIP Code of one jurisdiction because that-was used <br />to deliver the mail but actually lived in a neighboring jurisdiction, they <br />nevertheless will be counted in the correct jurisdiction because the physical <br />location of the house is recorded on the map by the enumerator and also assigned <br />the correct geographic code in our computer file which is used to tabulate the <br />data. <br /> <br />In other parts of the country, mostly the highly urbanized areas, the Census <br />Bureau purchased address lists from commercial mailing firms. In order to <br />assign the correct geography, i.e., county, city, etc., to these addresses, <br />the Census Bureau perfoms a computer operati'on'called ?geocoding." This <br />operation involves matching all of the addresses on the purchased address <br />list to a geocoding file containing all of the streets and the associated <br />address ranges for each block in these areas. Each Street and address range <br />is associated with numeric codes representing the State-county-township-city <br />where it is physically located. The file also contains the correct ZIP code <br /> <br /> <br />