My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/22/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 07/22/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:04:40 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 9:15:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/22/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
better targeting of state aid, <br /> Elsewhere, Hawaii since 1961 has used criteria for <br />designating distressed areas for special state aid. Other <br />states, such as Iowa, New 3'ersey and Ohio identify <br />distressed localities in the context of specific redevelop- <br />ment and renewal projects. <br /> State revenue sharing programs are one way for states to <br />directly aid localities. Michigan provides $600 million in <br />this manner, said Eugene Farnum, director of the Senate <br />Fiscal Agency. Detroit receives over $100 million in this <br />manner, plus a $20 million equity package for provision of <br />area-wide services, such as transportation and libraries. <br /> <br />bodies, the MDS performs existing regional services, with <br />the potential for additional services, should voters endorse <br />new tax measures, in such areas as libraries, correctional <br />facilities, water supply, human services, pm ks and cultural <br />and sports facilities. <br /> The list of ways in which states have been able to help <br />distressed cities and other local governments is long: Over- <br />sight and funding of local government pension systems; <br />fiscal notes and greater attention to state mandates on <br />localities; land use planning; housing authorities; <br />neighborhood improvement and community develop- <br />ment; and so forth. Specific actions have included <br />antireclining statutes. <br /> <br />"Unlike earlier recessions, this one will <br />be accompanied by political and <br /> <br />eether restraints on the ability of <br /> deral and state governments to <br /> <br />respond to the problems of localities." <br /> <br /> In Kansas, cities and counties receive aid from a state <br /> revenue-sharing fund financed by the state sales tax. <br /> Massachusetts helped Boston by increasing its state aid <br /> tre by half for fiscal 1979, modified school aid to <br /> the state contribution and assumed ,the costs of <br /> county court operations which had been funded by the city. <br /> In Virginia, a state revenue sharing plan disburses about <br /> half of the state's $2.6 billion revenues to local <br /> governments. Although the General Assembly recently <br /> stopped the practice of urban expansion into the suburbs <br />n~anCrease urban tax bases, the legislature recognized that <br />eased state aid will be needed to offset the cities' <br />ncial troubles. <br /> As Will Myers, senior analyst at the ACIR in Washing- <br /> ton, D.C. points out, one obvious area of funding where <br /> the states have increased their contribution is education, in <br /> an effort to reduce reliance on the property tax and provide <br /> more equal funding of schools. <br /> There are of course, many ways for states to enhance the <br /> fiscal resources of localities. Myers said they include allow- <br /> Lng local governments to piggy-back a local sales tax on the <br /> state sales tax, or letting them impose other, non-property <br /> taxes. <br /> Several urban reform policies initiated in Minnesota <br /> have been adopted or have been considered in other states. <br /> One path-breaking effort was the creation of a local tax- <br /> base sharing district in the Minneapolis-St. Paul <br /> metropolitan area which tries to reduce the urbana <br /> suburban fiscal disparity. <br /> In a similar vein is the three-county metropolitan service <br /> district (MSD) which voters approved in 1978 for the <br /> Portland, Oregon area. By combining existing regional <br /> <br /> Economic Development <br /> One major area of state activity has been in the economic <br />growth and development of localities, specifically the big <br />cities in some states, but also in smaller communities and <br />rural areas in other states. The ACIR study last year found <br />that "states have become increasingly attentive to local <br />growth and economic and community development con- <br />cerns-particularly over the last two years." <br /> The report noted that state efforts are usually aimed at <br />"fostering public-private cooperation, and employ a <br />variety of state powers to influence local growth and <br />development patterns." But, in the last two years, the <br />states have undertaken new "spending programs and fiscal <br />reforms to effect positive change." <br /> Not surprisingly, regional variations turned up in the <br />study. ACIR found Southern and Western states concern- <br />ed about the problems of small towns and rural areas, <br />while Western states also were specifically concerned over <br />the effects of rapid economic expansion. Midwestern and <br />Northeastern states were more likely to take action on cen- <br />tral city problems, according to the study. <br /> One example of a state's initiative on urban policy is <br />Massachusetts' 1977 Growth Policy Report, which urged <br />revision of state purchasing procedures and public siting <br /> <br />Will .Myers <br />Ad,,a~oO- Cornmissuan on Intergovernmental <br />Rdauor~ <br /> <br />Miles Friedma~ <br />National Council for Urban Economic <br />Devetopmem <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.