My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/26/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 08/26/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:05:07 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 11:11:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/26/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. MAJOR ISSUES RELATING TO IMPLEMENTATION AND FINANCING <br /> <br />OF POTENTIAL STRATEGIES <br /> <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br /> <br />What is necessary to encourage local units of government <br />private industry to make a commitment t__o ~ny abatement <br />strategy? What incentives are available? <br /> <br />The Council's land disposal abatement report is the first step in <br />identifying potential strategies to reduce the need for sanitary <br />landfills. The metropolitan counties are then required to submit <br />abatement proposals and, after amendment of the Council's regional <br />solid waste policy plan, adopt specific strategies within their own <br />county solid waste master plans. However, throughout this process, <br />there are no guarantees that the counties will actually commit the <br />time and resources needed to implement their adopted strategies. <br /> <br />The primary incentives for counties to move rapidly towards <br />implementing abatement strategies are the efficiencies gained in <br />terms of the disposal system and reduction in need for new landfill <br />capacity. However, if these are not sufficient for counties and <br />their constituent municipalities to implement abatement strategies, <br />other incentives should be explored, such as additional legislation <br />or financial or other political incentives. There is the additional <br />problem of how to encourage private industry to make the same type of <br />commitments. Will the same types of incentives be effective for <br />industry? <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />How should local units of government and industry ideally <br />proceed towards implementation? What are the logical <br />planning and development steps? <br /> <br />The counties and municipalities, along with private industry, will <br />need to have adequate information concerning the planning and <br />decision-making process relating to strategy implementation. Along <br />with a description of the preferred strategies, a step-by-step <br />process for implementation must be clearly outlined. Priorities will <br />have to be recommended for both short- and long-term abatement <br />objectives. <br /> <br />11. How should a county's comprehensive abatement program best be <br /> designed to involve all essential actors including haulers~ <br /> solid waste processors~ landfill owners~ and existing recycling <br /> operations? <br /> <br />If any county solid waste plan in this Region is to be effective, it <br />must involve the private sector. The counties should encourage early <br />participation in the decision-making process by representatives from <br />the various groups within the industry. One of the more effective <br />means of increasing the level of recovery of solid waste resources is <br />to utilize the existing systems, especially in terms of short range <br />plans and objectives. To what degree should the counties rely on <br />private development of potential strategies? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.