My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/30/1980 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 09/30/1980 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:06:22 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 12:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
09/30/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tuesday, September 23, 1980 <br /> 7:30-8:30 a.m. <br /> <br />Grain Exchange Cafeteria <br />3rd Street and 4th Avenue South <br /> <br /> CITIZENS LEAGUE <br />COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP BREAKFASTS <br /> <br />OVID LABERGE, Hopkins Police Chief <br /> <br />POLICE PRIVACY ISSUES <br /> <br /> Chief LaBerge and othe ' police officers have been facing <br />a problem as of late re~ard'ng the d~semination of informa- <br />tion about crimes to the pre~ The conflict between thg <br />public's right to know about police business and the in. <br />dividual r'~ht to pr'racy makes th's a thorny i,~ue for all <br />part e& <br /> <br />Among the questions we will ask Chief LaBerge are: <br /> <br />What do the laws say about what information is private <br />and what is public? What has happened recently that has <br />pola /zed the situation and created this conflict between <br />the press and police? <br /> <br />What information should be available to reporters? What <br />should not? <br /> <br />Current criticism of the police by reporters centers on <br />the fact that by giving pohce the right to determine what <br />is relea'.ed, the public has, in effect, no direct oversight <br />of police actions. How do pohce officials respond to this <br />criticism? <br /> <br />Northwestern Financial Cafeteria <br />7900 Xerxes Avenue South <br /> <br />Friday, September 26. 1980 <br /> 7'30-8 30 a.m <br /> <br />RAY GLUMACK, Executive Director, Metropolitan <br /> Airports Commission <br /> <br />FUTURE TRENDS FOR THE <br /> AREA S AIRPORTS <br /> <br /> Airline deregulation, the merger creating Republic <br />Airlines, and the designation of Wold-Chamberlain as a <br />European gateway airport will change the character of air <br />travel for the area. Ray Glumack will share with us his <br />thoughts about what will be happening here in coming <br />years. <br /> <br />We will be asking Mr. Glumack: <br /> <br />How much increased commercial traffic at Wold-Chain- <br />berlain can we expect from these recent developments? <br />Where will the general aviation traffic now using the <br />facility go if commercial use/nc: eases? <br /> <br />What are the current plans for expamion at Wold-Chain- <br />berlain? How much will you request from the 1981 <br />Legislature? <br /> <br />Is there anything on the horizon that might temper <br />growth prospects, such as a substitution of new means of <br />communication for bus!ness travel? <br /> <br /> Thursday, September 25, 1980; 7:30-8:30 a.m. <br />The Pilot House, Bank Dock Cafeteria; Ground Floor, First National Bank Building <br /> <br /> ELMER L. ANDERSEN, Former Governor <br /> <br /> DAVID ROE, President, Minnesota AFL-CiO <br /> INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM FOR MINNESOTA: PRO AND CON <br /> <br /> Former Governor Elmer Andersen is head of a committee supporting the proposal to amend the state's constitution to <br /> include init;atlve and referendum. David Roe, president of the Minnesota AFL-C/O, leads a coa..'ition of groups opposed to it. <br /> Together, they will d'~cuss the arguments in favor and against the amendment. <br /> <br /> We will ask Mr. Andersen: <br /> <br /> * Why should voters support the proposal? <br /> <br /> * Please expla:n the working of the measure proposed, especially the role of the sponsoring committee. How would that com- <br /> mittee work with the Legislature? <br /> <br /> * What sort of measures do you expect if the proposal is adopted? What problems will be addressed by it? <br /> <br /> We will ask Mr. Roe: <br /> <br /> * Why should voters reject this amendment? <br /> <br /> * How do you see the working of the p oposal? What sorts of measures do you think it would be used for? What problems <br /> would it create? <br /> <br /> ° What sorts of measures have been adopted in states which now have Initiative and Referendum? What is the role of the Leg/s- <br /> lature m states with Init'ative and Referendum? <br /> <br />Public/nv/ted/ Resell/at/ohs Appreciated: 338-07~1 Bring a Fr/endl <br /> P/ease Post This Notice <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.