My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:06:42 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 12:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/14/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 6 - <br /> <br />The third approach--industrial education--seeks to provide indus- <br />try with information and assistance in researching and developing <br />packaging methods that reduce solid waste. It is difficult to <br />know how effective industrial education will be in reducing solid <br />waste since information is not available on such a program in the <br />United States. <br /> <br />3. OFFICE PAPER REDUCTION <br /> <br />Office paper reduction, establishing policies that shrink office <br />paper consumption, can be implemented by the public and private <br />sectors to reduce solid waste. These policies could include in- <br />creased use of microfiche and magnetic media (computer discs and <br />tapes), and reducing use of carbon paper, computer printout <br />paper, letter paper, machine copy and business forms. <br /> <br />It is estimated by the MPCA that office paper reduction could <br />reduce paper consumption by 4.5 percent annually (MPCA, 1979). <br />But, since only 52 to 53 percent of all consumer office paper is <br />discarded, the potential reduction of solid waste amounts to only <br />0.7 percent of the solid waste stream. <br /> <br />4. PRODUCT CHARGE <br /> <br />Today's prices for products generally do not reflect the costs <br />imposed on society for disposal of solid waste. The goal of pro- <br />duct charges is to incorporate those costs into the cost of the <br />product. The charge could take three forms: a unit chanrge, a <br />weight charge or a combination of both. The unit charge has the <br />least administrative burden, while the combination would have the <br />greatest reduction impact. Product charges have appeal in that <br />they use the market to encourage solid waste reduction, and pro- <br />vide funds to defray the solid waste management costs imposed by <br />products. <br /> <br />Three studies commissioned by EPA indicate that general conser- <br />vation through the use of product charges could reduce waste by <br />two to three percent (Bingham, 1974; Miedema, 1976; ~iedema; in <br />preparation) For purposes of this report, a maximum waste reduction <br />potential of 2.6 pe£cent was assumed. <br /> <br />Product charges could potentially solve financial problems en- <br />countered by local government for solid waste collection and <br />disposal and at the same time provide a revenue source for other <br />recovery programs. However, it is doubtful whether a product <br />charge could be applied on a state level because of potential <br />conflict with interstate commerce. Federal legislation would <br />provide for more efficient and consistent implementation of pro- <br />duct charges. <br /> <br />5. WASTE CHARGE <br /> <br />A waste charge is a fee levied on each ton or cubic yard of waste <br />being disposed. The fee would be collected at landfills or pro- <br />cessing facilities as a part of the disposal fee. Althouah there <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.