My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:06:42 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 12:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/14/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 26 - <br /> <br />'The cost of curb-side leaf collection and centralized composting <br />through the windrow method can vary between $4.75 and $7.35 per <br />ton (MPCA, 1980). Of course, if backyard composting is used as a <br />community's preferred program, the only cost incurred will be from <br />public education materials and staff time. <br /> <br />In-office paper recycling programs are generally recognized to <br />have the potential for net savings to any agency or business with <br />at least 200 employees, depending on the type of organization. <br />Since the paper markets will supply most of the necessary employee <br />education literature, including desk-top recycling files, and <br />actually conduct the first "how to" instruction seminars, the only <br />costs to the office establishment are usually the price of <br />centralized containers where the employees dump their desk-top <br />recycling files, and start-up staff time. The savings from <br />reduced mixed-waste collection costs and revenues usually exceed <br />the minimal capital and operating costs. Essentially, once this <br />type of program begins, it runs itself with only a minimum of <br />monitoring and occasional employee reminders. <br /> <br />Separation program costs involving manual picking will vary, <br />depending on the system and amount of labor time. In order to <br />break even, the program must generate enough revenue from the <br />materials to recover costs of wages, including fringe benefits and <br />transport costs. Probably the most extensive program today is in <br />California, where excellent corrugated markets, availablity of a <br />minimum-wage labor force and favorable weather provide the <br />ingredients for a successful program <br /> <br />The economics of mechanical separation programs are better known <br />because of the research completed by existing industries and the <br />National Center for Resource Recovery (NCRR). The New Orleans <br />demonstation project indicated that capital and operating costs <br />for mechanical separation of recyclable materials were: <br /> <br />Glass <br />Aluminum <br />Ferrous <br /> <br />$200 per ton <br />$200 per ton <br />$5 to $20 per ton <br /> <br />Current market prices in the Region for these materials are: <br /> <br />Glass <br />Aluminum <br />Ferrous <br /> <br />$40 per ton <br />$460 to $600 per ton <br />$0 to $10 per ton <br /> <br />3. WASTE PROCESSING <br /> <br />Full-scale shredder technology is not currently economically <br />feasible at small disposal sites. For a 300 tons per day (TPD) <br />facility, current costs are on the order of $7.00 per ton ($7.89 <br />per metric ton). A detailed analysis would be required to <br />determine if the benefits, in terms of saved landfill space and <br />reduced cover, would be sufficient to justify the capital and <br />operating costs incurred to implement shredder systems. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.