My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:30:58 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 3:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
contractors corning in with their trailers will have a problern if it is moved to this location. This <br />is something that should be moved off of the consent agenda and debated so people can see the <br />pros and cons. He stated there was an article about the billion dollar urban village that stated <br />Jotm Feges said he and his partner do not need City money. There is now something like 16 <br />million dollars in infrastructure, 11 million dollars for ramps, and 15.8 million dollars for a <br />parking garage. This is a staggering amount for bonding and he does not la~o,,v that it has been <br />debated. <br /> <br />Mayor Garnec stated there was a public input meeting to discuss the City Hall, which included <br />looking at the concepts and financing. This information was all brought up to the people and <br />there was a notice in the Ramsey l~esicte~t. The City has never tried to go around this. They have <br />been open with the people. The Ramsey Resident goes to every resident in the City, and there <br />was also an article in the newspaper. Everything was properly done, and the Council made a <br />recomrnendation that this had to be open to the public. If Mr. Zaetsch does not receive the <br />Rctmsey Reside~t he should let them know and they will get his inforrnation to him. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen indicated at the July 7rl~ Council meeting, case #4 was a report from <br />the Finance Committee regarding a proposal from BKV to continue desi~ work. That was a <br />regular case and they did debate the issue. This case on the consent agenda is just a transfer of <br />those funds. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund noted this issue was presented for discussion as Councihnember Strommen <br />has stated. She explained any time funds are transferred a resolution must be acted on. There <br />was not a resolution attached to the case when it ,,vas discussed, and this case on the consent <br />agenda is part of the July 27th action. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook stated this is all part of the Town Center planning, in which the City <br />signed a development agreelnent that said the City would take possession of property there and <br />put a City Hall there within five years of the time they signed that agreement. That also went <br />through public hearings. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated the Council has handled everything in order and has made this open to the <br />public. He resents the statement that they are not open to the public; he has never seen a City as <br />open as this Council in informing the public. He feels they did an excellent job of informing the <br />people. He thanked Mr. Zaetsch for his comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Zaetsch stated the Council has imposed a surcharge, which is tike saying these are hard <br />times, and the money is not there. <br /> <br />Mayor Garnec stated he does not want to get into a political speech tonight; this is a Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />-28- <br /> <br />City Council/August 10, 2004 <br /> Page 4 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.