My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:30:58 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 3:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cou,~cilmember Strommen indicated granting permission for a property owner to put in a <br />retaining wall in the easement could create problems if they were to sell the property. Eventually <br />the property owner may not be the person that put in the retaining wall at their own risk. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook commented if everyone was to put in a retaining wall at their own risk <br />there would not be anywhere for the water to go. The retaining walls should be kept out of the <br />easements. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak stated she is amazed anything can be put in an easement. She thought <br />property owners were required to maintain the easement, but that they do not own it. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised the easement can be used as long as it does not interfere with the. <br />intended use o f the easement. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained the City has control of all structures and <br />requires building permits for every building that goes up so they can determine it is in an <br />appropriate place. This policy should either prohibit retaining walls in the easements or require <br />permits tbr every retaining wall, regardless of where they are located. <br /> <br />Counci hnember Kurak expressed concern of allowing anything in an easement. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook noted this would set the policy that the retaining walls cannot be placed in <br />at] easement, and would give staff the attthority to require a retaining wall located in an easement <br />to be removed. <br /> <br />The consensus of' the Council was that the policy should prohibit retaining walls in easements, <br />with no language included regarding obtaining permission to build a retaining wall. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, second by Councilmember Cook, to ratify the recommendation <br />of the Public Works Committee and adopt the following policy prohibiting retaining walls in <br />drainage and utility and right-of-way easements. <br /> <br />A Policy Prohibiting Retaining Walls <br />Within Drainage and Utility Easements <br /> <br />The location of retaining walls within drainage and utility easements has the potential to cause <br />damage to the wall trom flooding events. In addition, the construction of retaining walls results <br />in decreasing the volume of the designed pond volume which consequently reduces the <br />protection to property fi'om flooding. For the above reasons it shall be .the policy of the City of <br />Ramscy to prohibit the construction of arty retaining wall within a drainage easement, utility <br />easement, and right-of-way easement. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Cook, Kurak, Strornmen, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: CouncilmemberPearson. <br /> <br />City Council/August 10, 2004 <br /> Page 19 of 27 <br /> <br />-43- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.