My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/11/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 04/11/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:31:41 PM
Creation date
4/10/2017 9:28:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
754
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Traditional Single-Family/Small Lot Single-Family and Villa Lots <br /> Miscellaneous Standards Detached Townhomes <br /> Lot size None <br /> Minimum density net 3.0 <br /> Maximum density net 7.0 <br /> Lot width None <br /> Building setback from public street right- 25 feet <br /> of-way <br /> Building setback from private street 25 feet <br /> measured from back of curb <br /> Building setback from exterior 30 feet <br /> development boundary line 25 feet(detached) <br /> Minimum separation between buildings, 20 feet <br /> including any appurtenances thereto (i.e., 15 feet(detached) <br /> patios, decks <br /> Parking node setback from exterior 30 feet <br /> development boundary line <br /> Parking node setback from structure 15 feet <br /> Maximum lot coverage 35% <br /> Maximum building height(measured from 35 feet <br /> mean ground level to mean able <br /> Accessory structure setback (measured 30 feet <br /> from the development boundary line <br /> Maximum number of units per structure 81 (detached) <br /> Open space required 40% general open space 10% of which must <br /> be identifiable community space <br /> The only deficiency in the above table would be the minimum separation between buildings. The <br /> Planning Commission and City Council have already seen this project in concept, and appeared <br /> generally supportive of the overall approach. The PUD appears to be an appropriate tool in this <br /> instance. <br /> Continued on next page. <br /> It is our mission to work together to responsibly grow our community,and to provide quality, cost-effective and efficient government <br /> services. <br /> Riverstone Addition Planning Division Review March 31,2017(Sketch Plan) <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.