Laserfiche WebLink
Sbyn 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 <br /> 1 1 1 1 1 <br /> • Open to a project in the short/near-term <br /> • Focus =business park <br /> • Open to the concept of retail <br /> • Future school will provide its own buffer for compatibili <br /> • Written Comments: <br /> o Industrial/business <br /> o Retail option <br /> o Not the school area or land on Alpine= residential <br /> o Residential north half <br /> • Industrial park south half <br /> Hageman Residential Portion (36 Acres along Alpine Drive) <br /> • High quality architecture <br /> • Single-family feel <br /> • Allow for some clustering with permanent buffer <br /> • See Saint Michael example <br /> o Hans Hagen development adjacent to J&B Group <br /> o Medium density with screening/buffer <br /> ■ Twin-homes; small-lot single-family <br /> Future School Site(North of Bunker and Sub-Area 'B) <br /> • Current vision remains a school (user to be determined) or other youth-focused <br /> philanthropic endeavor <br /> • If unable to develop as a school: <br /> o Potential for retail development(first choice) <br /> o Also potential for a business park <br /> • Existing standards may be too restrictive <br /> o Continue quality standards on the facade <br /> o Default to traditional bulk standards (setbacks,parking,etc.) <br /> • Potential/need for frontage roads <br /> • Potential for railroad crossings and/or railroad spurs <br /> • Hageman Holdings OK with concept of adjacent retail (Sub-Area'B') <br /> • Market should drive scale of retail <br /> o Large-scale (big-box) or small/medium-scale (convenience,food, etc.). <br /> o Not quite at the stage to fully determine where exact locations or large, medium, <br /> or small scale should be-let the market drive <br /> • Reduced visibility due to Armstrong Interchange <br /> • Need taller signs <br /> • Written Comments: <br /> o Retail as best fit for the new interchange,etc. <br /> o Industrial park to the west <br />