Laserfiche WebLink
want to continue pursuing the purchase of this property, our earnest money goes non-refundable ($25,000), and we <br /> enter into the "closing period" of the purchase agreement.We formally take that step by providing something <br /> known as a"notice-to-proceed"to the seller. The City is now ready to provide the seller with a"notice-to-proceed" <br /> to closing, as described in the purchase agreement. <br /> NOTE: our purchase agreement requires approval from the Metropolitan Council (for a RALF loan)before the City <br /> will close. In the event the Metropolitan Council does not approve our RALF application,the City can still walk <br /> away from this purchase agreement. In that scenario,we would lose our earnest money, and all of the dollars we <br /> have spent to-date (due diligence).We have until July 01, 2017 to close.We expect to close in early June. <br /> Observations/Alternatives: <br /> ATTACHED: <br /> (1) Resolution 17-04-080. This resolution is the purpose of this case. It outlines Council action being taken. <br /> (2) RALF Application. This is the application staff will be providing the Metropolitan Council. <br /> (3) RALF Loan.This is the draft RALF loan agreement between the City and Metropolitan Council. <br /> (4) Purchase Agreement.This is the land acquisition agreement between the City of Ramsey and Athans Holdings. <br /> (5) Due Diligence. This is all of the due diligence completed on this project,wrapped into one single attachment. <br /> This is very long. If Councilmembers would like individual documents,please email staff. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> -short term- <br /> The City has a an account in place today,that captures revenues from all Ramsey-owned properties located along <br /> Highway 10,that were purchased via RALF, and are currently being leased to private organizations. This "Internal <br /> Ramsey RALF Fund" can ONLY be used on expenses related to RALF/properties purchased via RALF. The <br /> balance of that account is $186,000 roughly. Staff is using this account as a temporary/short-term project funding <br /> source (due-diligence costs). <br /> -long term- <br /> The long term/permanent funding source proposed for this project is the RALF program. The the background <br /> section of this case describes the program. The attached application describes the City's proposal. Once the <br /> purchase agreement is closed, all costs will be funded via this new RALF program loan.NOTE: there is a chance <br /> that the Metropolitan Council does not agree with our project budget, and doesn't reimburse the City for everything <br /> we ask. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Staff is comfortable moving forward with formally applying to the Metropolitan RALF program. Staff has had <br /> several conversations with MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council RE this project. Both groups have previously <br /> provided preliminary support for this application, and recent conversations with both groups have also been <br /> positive. <br /> RE the actual purchase of 6401,based on information in-hand, and discussions with Bruan InterTech/the City <br /> Attorney, staff is comfortable with recommending purchase of this property.With the contingencies below in mind, <br /> it appears both the site and building are clean, and usable for the proposed future use (right-of-way). <br /> (1) Minor trace vapor contamination in soils exists,minor trace water contamination exists, and minor trace <br /> contamination in soils exists. Braun has indicated findings on this site DO NOT exceed industry maximums <br /> (they are below). These findings are not surprising for a redevelopment site,with several past auto-related <br /> users. Based on information in hand, Braun does not have any concerns using this site for a future roadway, <br /> and doesn't anticipate any major remediation. The MPCA has provided closure letters on the water <br /> contamination item in the past. Please see actual Phase II ESA for official information/details. <br /> (2) Outside of various standard items (items found in all buildings),the pre-demolition building survey came <br /> back clean. Braun did leave a contingency RE the roof liner--per industry standards,the roof should be tested <br />