My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/11/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 04/11/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:31:41 PM
Creation date
4/10/2017 9:28:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
754
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Market Participant Interviews <br /> For this specific appraisal assignment, market participants were interviewed to discuss general <br /> market conditions, as well as specific factors influencing the subject property. A brief summary <br /> of the discussions is as follows: <br /> • Subject Listing Broker—(Nate Hansen, Colliers International): <br /> Comments: <br /> • The subject had good, successful operation as a gas station until the access <br /> changed as part of the 2007/2008 road project along US Highway 10 and Sunfish <br /> Lake Boulevard. <br /> • Now, the right-in, right-out only access from Highway 10 and Sunfish Lake <br /> Boulevard has limited potential buyers of the subject, particularly those desiring <br /> high-traffic uses. The train tracks to the north of the property also limit the <br /> potential for u-turns. <br /> • In all four Anoka County long-term plans associated with the subject's corridor, <br /> the subject (and other nearby properties) are specifically identified as being <br /> eventually taken by the County via eminent domain or other, earlier means. <br /> • Since listing the property approximately 6 months ago, they have presented the <br /> subject to numerous gas station owner/operators, all of which were not <br /> interested in the subject given the access constraints. <br /> • He stated that the most probable use for the subject would be to remove the <br /> canopy and fuel tanks, and to renovate the improvements into a general retail use <br /> with 1-3 tenants. He noted that they would not be national-credit tenants (which <br /> would be precluded given the access issue), but that it would most likely be local- <br /> credit tenants that are more destination oriented as opposed to traffic-centric. <br /> • He did not have an exact estimate of the cost of removing the canopy and tanks, <br /> or of the interior demising or car wash conversion costs. However, he thought the <br /> canopy and tanks could potentially cost $50,000 to $75,000 total. He stated that <br /> the property would need a new facade, and while it was structurally sound, it was <br /> a little beat up inside, and would require some work to get it to a vanilla shell. <br /> • Broker 1— (Confidential) <br /> Comments: <br /> • Has several land listings along US Highway 10. <br /> • Access is a big issue, because people know that they (i.e. the County and Cities) <br /> are taking away access points. <br /> • Retailers want full access and visibility; they need both. <br /> 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.