My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 04/13/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2017
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 04/13/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:14:23 PM
Creation date
4/10/2017 12:34:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
04/13/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. WHY SHOULDN'T THE DEVELOPERS PAY FOR EVERYTHING? <br /> (How will this arterial infrastructure project effect land values in the business park?) <br /> Bunker Lake Boulevard/ Puma Street are considered arterial infrastructure/trunk infrastructure/ <br /> collector roadways. These roadways are a designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) route—much like <br /> Alpine, Variolite, Sunwood, or 167th Ave. Bunker/ Puma proposed improvements include "trunk" <br /> water/sewer lines; which are identified in the city's adopted Comprehensive Water/Sewer Plans. <br /> In summary, the arterial infrastructure proposed for Bunker/Puma will serve more than just the <br /> immediately adjacent parcels. <br /> RE THE BUSINESS PARK AREA <br /> Market rate asking prices for raw, shovel-ready, industrial land in the Ramsey area is$2.00- <br /> $3.50 per square foot. <br /> If Hageman Holdings was asked to pay for 100%of all new arterial infrastructure running <br /> adjacent to their site, land prices are predicted to range from $2.00-$3.15 per square foot <br /> MINIMUM. This price does not include the cost of any needed internal infrastructure, time- <br /> value-of-money, broker fees, or profit-margin for Hageman Holdings, etc. Likely, if this was <br /> the scenario, asking prices would escalate well over$3.00 psf. <br /> Elk River, Ramsey's biggest economic development competitor, has been listing industrial land <br /> for$2.50 psf, before use of economic development incentives. In some cases,via use of <br /> economic development incentives, said $2.50 psf priced land has been written down to <br /> significantly lower prices (less than $1.00 psf), or in some cases, even down to zero. <br /> In order to stay competitive, based on asking prices, Ramsey should stay below$3.00 psf, and <br /> ideally be closer to $2.00 psf, for asking prices. Additionally, the City should be prepared to use <br /> economic development incentives (such as TIF). <br /> Hageman Holdings has set their asking prices from $2.25 to$2.75 psf,which includes existing <br /> assessments (i.e. 2013 Legacy project assessments are NOT an additional cost to a buyer). <br /> Hageman Holdings has also indicated, they understand, that if additional NEW assessments are <br /> placed against their property (for this proposed arterial infrastructure project),they will likely <br /> need to discount that value from their existing asking prices, in order to stay relevant/ <br /> competitive in the marketplace (i.e.take less for the land). Hageman Holdings has indicated <br /> they understand that need, and are okay with that approach, and understand they need to stay <br /> at the$2.25-$2.75 asking prices. Hageman Holdings has indicated they are willing to sign <br /> another Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) outlining that position. <br /> Lastly, it should be noted, asking prices are different than what price a deal can be done—likely, <br /> Hageman would be willing to sell at a price closer to $2.00 psf(depending on the project/ <br /> negotiation). <br /> STAFF NOTE:the new Hageman Holdings assessments are estimated to range between <br /> $280K to $350K total. If that new assessment is spread across the former school site, it <br /> comes out to 10 to 13 cents per square foot, or$4,516 to$5,645 per acre. <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.