My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:32:02 PM
Creation date
4/25/2017 2:48:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
838
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ensuring that the pedestrian bridge remain a named, phased element of the park's <br /> development is essential in calling attention to its significance as a Regional facility— <br /> as this is strategically important to securing grant funding. <br /> Conformance with Anoka County Policies and Plans <br /> Evidence of the importance and relevance for continued <br /> �•°°^°°°° ° ° •�PoP collaboration and cooperation in securing funding for completion of <br /> the skyway and pedestrian bridge is noted on page 17 of the Draft <br /> Amendment. It cites survey results from the 2016 'Plan Your Parks' <br /> - Public Events: "62% would prefer to walk or bike to a park as opposed <br /> PLA1�� to having to drive.Again, this shows support for the trail projects outlined <br /> PARKS <br /> pl�y..rwi—o,c— in the amendments and shows the importance of connectivity throughout <br /> the local and regional trail system." <br /> Further evidence that the pedestrian crossing with direct connection <br /> to the Northstar rail station and the 887 Bus Route stop, should <br /> Anoka Count TMO remain a priority is cited on page 20 of the Draft Amendment: <br /> Commute <br /> "Since the majority of participants end up driving to the parks and trails, <br /> Solutions the Department should work with County's Transportation Division, local <br /> ► �= cities and the Metropolitan Council to ensure multiple modes of <br /> transportation options exist for access to the system tem and that future trails <br /> provide the needed connections between the residential areas surrounding <br /> the park." <br /> Compliance with Regional Policies and Plans <br /> Like the City of Ramsey, Anoka County is also in the process of updating its <br /> Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to Minn. Statute 473.864, the County's park plans must <br /> be consistent with both the Metropolitan Council's Thrive 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan <br /> as well as the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. Both the City and County's comprehensive <br /> plans are reviewed by the Metropolitan Council based on three primary criteria: <br /> • Conformance with metropolitan system plans <br /> • Consistency with Metropolitan Council policies <br /> • Compatibility with adjacent and affected governmental units. <br /> When a plan meets these criteria, the Metropolitan Council authorizes comprehensive <br /> plans, and park plans to be put into effect. If a plan does not meet the review standards, <br /> Mississippi West Regional Park Master Plan Amendment—City of Ramsey Response <br /> Page 2 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.