Laserfiche WebLink
Regional Park Study Areas <br /> Typically, new regional parks are proposed as search areas that have been identified based on high- <br /> quality natural resources located in portions of the region where population growth is expected. <br /> However, there are times when a regional park implementing agency may want to propose including <br /> existing parks into the Regional Park System. In an effort to make an informed decision, further study is <br /> required to assess whether the proposed addition is of regional significance. The proposed area for <br /> consideration is called a Regional Park Study Area. Designation as a Regional Park Study Area does <br /> not guarantee that a park will become part of the Regional Parks System. It acknowledges that studies <br /> would need to be conducted to determine whether the facility warrants regional status. Once these <br /> studies are complete, the information would be presented to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space <br /> Commission and the Council for evaluation. The Council's 2008 Regional Parks and Trails Survey <br /> shows that at least 40% of visits to most regional parks are made by people who do not live in the <br /> jurisdiction of the respective regional park implementing agency where the park is located. Therefore, <br /> the benchmark applied for qualifying as a regional distribution of visitation is 40% non-local visits in <br /> evaluating a regional park study area. <br /> Deletion of a Proposed Regional Park Study Area <br /> The 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan included a regional park study area in northern Dakota County. <br /> Dakota County proposed evaluating the feasibility of combining Thompson County Park in West St. <br /> Paul with Kaposia Park and Kaposia Landing, two local parks in South St. Paul, into one regional park <br /> unit. Council staff worked with Dakota County to conduct visitor origin surveys at these parks in 2012. <br /> The results of the study determined that 16.7 percent of visits were non-local and that the Thompson <br /> Kaposia Study Area did not meet the regional visitation distribution criteria. The Thompson-Kaposia <br /> Regional Park Study Area has been removed from the System Plan Map as part of the 2040 Regional <br /> Parks Policy Plan. <br /> 2040 Regional Parks System Plan Summary <br /> As Figure 3-11 illustrates, the 2040 System Plan includes: <br /> • Existing Regional Parks System facilities (2014) <br /> 42 regional parks <br /> 12 park reserves <br /> 8 special recreation features <br /> 40 regional trails, consisting of 340 miles <br /> • Planned Regional Parks System facilities that are not yet open to the public <br /> 4 regional parks <br /> 1 park reserve <br /> 12 regional trails, consisting of 147 miles <br /> • Regional Parks System Boundary Adjustments <br /> 2 regional parks <br /> 1 park reserve <br />