Laserfiche WebLink
5.02: Receive Update on Covenant Meadows and Consider Environmental Review <br /> Options (Project#17-102): Case of Eric Thomson <br /> City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of the case is to review <br /> an application for a rezoning of the subject property from R-1 Rural Developing to Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD) and Preliminary Plat. He stated that the site is generally located south of <br /> Trott Brook and west of Germanium Street. He stated that the applicant has proposed to subdivide <br /> the approximately 38-acre subject property into 12 single family homes that would be serviced by <br /> individual private utilities. The Preliminary Plat proposes deeding approximately 15 of 38 acres <br /> to the City as the public benefit in relation to the PUD application. He stated that the proposed 15 <br /> acres straddles Trott Brook,has steep slopes, and is also considered to be high quality natural open <br /> space. He noted that this is simply an update and formal action is not required. <br /> City Councilmember LeTourneau stated that there was a proposal for some trail right-of-way but <br /> that does not seem appropriate because of the slope. <br /> City Planner Anderson stated that staff believes that it still has merit to look at a trail corridor from <br /> the edge of the cul-de-sac to the land that would be deeded to the City. He stated that a trail to the <br /> brook would not be provided because of the steep slope. He provided additional details on possible <br /> locations for a walking trail through that area. <br /> Board Member Valentine asked how likely it would be to require or request an EAW. <br /> City Planner Anderson explained the triggers for an EAW, noting that the mandatory threshold is <br /> 250 units, while this proposed development is only 12 units. He stated that staff believes that 12 <br /> additional units will not have an impact on the aquifer that these homes would draw from and <br /> provided additional details. <br /> 5.03: Consider Draft 2017-2018 Work Plan <br /> City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of this case is to <br /> consider the Draft 2017-2018 Work Plan for the Environmental Policy Board. He stated that the <br /> EPB had identified four elements in February for inclusion in a Work Plan and those items were <br /> presented to the City Council at a joint meeting in February. He stated that the Draft Work Plan <br /> has been formatted to mirror that of the City Council's Strategic Plan as well as the Work Plan of <br /> the Planning Commission. <br /> Board Member Valentine stated that City Planner Anderson did a great job compiling the <br /> information. <br /> Chairperson Stodola stated that he also likes this format for the Work Plan. <br /> City Planner Anderson stated that this is the template used by the City Council. <br /> City Councilmember LeTourneau stated that the previous year the Board created the Statement of <br /> Purpose and thought the development of the Work Plan was a great logical next step. He noted <br /> the staff time that is shown and asked if this list of items might be too big of a commitment for <br /> staff to accomplish in the next year. <br /> Environmental Policy Board/March 20, 2017 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />