Laserfiche WebLink
Special Circumstances <br /> Lack of Available Acquisition Opportunity Funds <br /> If funds are not available to fully fund a grant during a given fiscal year, up to 60% of the next fiscal <br /> year's appropriation and matching Council bonds for Park Acquisition Opportunity Fund accounts will <br /> be used to reimburse park agencies for up to 75% of the grant-eligible acquisition costs or $1.7 million <br /> - whichever is less - the park agency incurred to buy land that would have qualified for a Park <br /> Acquisition Opportunity Fund grant under the rules. <br /> The park agency must request reimbursement consideration from the Council by providing all data <br /> required for a Park Acquisition Opportunity Fund grant required by the rules and obtain Council <br /> approval before it acquires the land. The 25% match is not grant-eligible for reimbursement from the <br /> Park Acquisition Opportunity Fund accounts. However, the park agency may request reimbursement of <br /> that match as part of its share of future park capital improvement programs. <br /> Third-party Acquisitions <br /> When funds are not available in the Acquisition Opportunity Fund accounts, park implementing <br /> agencies may choose to work with third parties to acquire Council-approved master plan acquisitions, <br /> for which reimbursement from the Council would be pursued when funds are available. In this instance, <br /> the Council may consider acquisition with a bonafide deferred closing. <br /> Excess of Available Acquisition Opportunity Funds <br /> One year before the expiration of the state appropriation to each Park Acquisition Opportunity Fund <br /> Grant account (that is, PTLF and ENRTF), the Council - in consultation with the regional park <br /> implementing agencies and the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission - will conduct a <br /> review of these rules to determine if additional steps should be taken to increase the likelihood that the <br /> balance of the expiring state appropriation will be granted and spent before its expiration date. <br /> An example of such a step would be to allow a park agency that has received the maximum amount <br /> allowed - $1.7 million from the ENRTF account or $1.7 million from the PTLF account in a state fiscal <br /> year, July 1 to June 30 to be eligible to receive an additional grant. Another step could be that 60 days <br /> before a state appropriation's expiration date, that grants are awarded to partially reimburse the local <br /> match of grants awarded from the applicable acquisition account that were initially financed with that <br /> state appropriation and matching Council bonds. <br /> The total amount of these reimbursement grants would consume the remaining state appropriation and <br /> applicable Council bond match. The amount of each reimbursement grant should be proportionate to <br /> the local match amount initially funded by each park agency - not with other funding sources the park <br /> agency used as their match. These reimbursement grants would only be for grants initially financed <br /> from that soon-to-expire state appropriation and applicable Council bond match. If there were still funds <br /> remaining, reimbursement grants for the local matches on other acquisitions could be considered that <br /> were initially financed from that acquisition account but from an earlier appropriation. <br /> Such variances to the rules for these situations would be considered by the Council without undertaking <br /> a public hearing process since the vetting of the changes is made by the park agencies affected by the <br />