Laserfiche WebLink
Covenant Meadows is 1.00 acres. In exchange for the reduced lot size,the Applicant is proposing to deed to the <br /> City approximately fifteen (15) acres of land. The land being proposed has a high natural value as it straddles both <br /> sides of the Trott Brook and encompasses the steep slopes in the area. The Applicant is willing to provide a trail <br /> easement between lots 5 and 6 of block 1 so as to provide all lots in the proposed development and the <br /> neighborhood with access to this public amenity. <br /> Upon further review of the contours of the steep slopes, Staff has identified that an ADA compliant trail is not <br /> feasible;however, Staff has identified that a twenty(20) foot trail easement should still be included between lots 5 <br /> and 6 of block 1 and that an eight(8) foot bituminous trail be constructed within that easement and that the trail <br /> terminate with a fifteen(15) foot bituminous bulb within Outlot A as part of the Stage I Improvements. The <br /> bituminous trail will need to connect to the bituminous edge of Iodine St NW and that connection will need to be <br /> ADA compliant. The Applicant is currently proposing a rural road section with a ditch system to convey runoff, so <br /> a culvert will be necessary to allow for the free flowing of runoff as well as elevate the trail connection to the <br /> roadway. <br /> With the Preliminary Plat,the Applicant is proposing twelve (12) Single Family lots that would be serviced by <br /> individual private utilities. The lots being proposed range in size from 1.00 acres to 2.92 acres in size and in lot <br /> width of approximately 100 feet to over 200 feet. In addition to the reduced lot size and lot width,the proposed <br /> cul-de-sac length also exceeds 600 feet. Public Safety has reviewed this request. Police does not have any <br /> objections to the road configuration. The Fire Department has noted a couple potential concerns. One is that this is a <br /> non-hydranted area and thus, if there were a structure fire,tanker trucks would be necessary and maneuverability <br /> would be tough. Secondly, if there were trees down,it would also slow response time for first responders. It should <br /> be noted though that these conditions already exist with Iodine Street in this same neighborhood(that cul-de-sac is <br /> approximately 1,000 feet in length).No additional deviations from City Code are being requested in connection <br /> with the Covenant Meadows Preliminary Plat application. Generally speaking the Preliminary Plat is acceptable to <br /> Staff with changes to the plan set identified in the Staff Review Letter,which is attached to this case. <br /> The proposed PUD and Subdivision are tentatively scheduled for review by the Parks and Recreation Commission <br /> at their March meeting. <br /> Alternatives for future consideration. <br /> Alternative 1: Approval of Ordinance#17-05 rezoning the Subject Property from R-1 Residential (Rural <br /> Developing)to PUD (Planned Unit Development) and recommend approval of Resolution# 17-02-053 granting <br /> Preliminary Plat approval of Covenant Meadows, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. Staff <br /> believes that the proposed development is reasonable, compatible with the character of the surrounding <br /> development,minimizes impacts to steep slopes adjacent to the Trott Brook, and provides the City and its residents <br /> with an important natural resource amenity surrounding Trott Brook. Staff supports Alternative 1 at this time. <br /> Alternative 2: Denial of Ordinance#17-05 rezoning of the Subject Property from R-1 Residential (Rural <br /> Developing)to PUD (Planned Unit Development). If the Planning Commission recommends denial of the rezoning <br /> then it should also recommend denial of the proposed Preliminary Plat and Resolution#17-02-053 as the proposed <br /> plat would only be considered under the zoning guidance of a PUD.However,the proposed development and <br /> public benefit in connection to the PUD request is viewed as adequate by Staff and thus, Staff is not supportive of <br /> this alternative at this time. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> No action being requested. <br /> Action: <br /> No action being requested. This case is an update only. <br />