Laserfiche WebLink
A Citizen's Guide: Commenting on Environmental Review Projects <br /> 03 <br /> which is available on the EQB's website: https://www.egb.state.mn.us/eqb-monitor.Make sure to file comments with <br /> the RGU before the comment period closes. The RGU can legally disregard untimely comments. <br /> The table below outlines the different commenting periods for each method of environmental review: <br /> Type of Environmental Description Comment Calendar/Business <br /> Review Period Days <br /> Provides a brief analysis and overview of the <br /> EAW possible environmental impacts of a project 30 Days Actual calendar days <br /> Helps prepare for the Final AUAR and required- <br /> Draft <br /> equiredDraft AUAR mitigation plan. 30 Days Actual calendar days <br /> A planning tool used to understand how different <br /> Final AUAR and required development scenarios would affect the 10 Days Business/working days <br /> mitigation plan environment of the community. <br /> A document similar to an EAW,but is used to <br /> Scoping EAW(for an EIS) outline the issues that will be addressed in an 30 Days Actual calendar days <br /> EIS. <br /> An in-depth environmental analysis that <br /> Draft EIS frequently takes more than one year to complete >25 Days Business/working days <br /> and includes a mandatory public meeting. <br /> JL <br /> Although there is a 10-day public comment <br /> Final EIS period for a Final EIS,no response to comments 10 Days Business/working days <br /> by the RGU is required. <br /> Accepted comments <br /> The RGU is required to evaluate and respond to substantive comments. Substantive comments address the content or <br /> issue raised in the EAW,AUAR or EIS. For example,"The project developer is a jerk,"or,"I am against this project," <br /> would not be considered substantive.Public comments are particularly valuable and helpful the RGU when they: <br /> • List any inaccuracies in the EAW,EIS,AUAR or other accompanying documents. <br /> • Show potential environmental impacts that haven't been identified by the proposer or the RGU. <br /> • Show that certain environmental impacts have been identified,but haven't been adequately addressed. <br /> • Suggest possible mitigation measures that should be added to the proposal <br /> Clearly written comments are more useful to RGUs and are more likely to get some kind of action.For example,"I'm <br /> concerned about water quality,"may express your concerns,but,"My 50 foot-deep drinking water well is within a <br /> quarter mile of the proposed gravel mine,"will draw the RGUs' attention much better. Similarly,"I don't want a landfill <br /> in my neighborhood,"may be a legitimate concern,but the RGU could actually be in violation of state law if it denied <br /> the landfill permit for that reason alone. It would be better to identify other potential impacts by saying something like, <br /> "The additional traffic from this project creates public safety and air quality issues.There is a public school and two <br /> day-care centers along the proposed haul road to the new landfill". <br /> Writing a comment letter <br /> The goal of commenting is to communicate concerns about the potential environmental effects of the project. If the <br /> comment fails to be both understandable and believable,then the effort put into that comment will be wasted. The <br /> following tips will help effectively communicate a comment to the RGU. <br /> 3 <br />