My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/28/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 09/28/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:31:56 PM
Creation date
9/24/2004 2:38:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/28/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11,000 square foot retail building) on July 12, 2004 contingent on the applicant receiving several <br />variances. On July 27, 2004, the City Council approved the three preliminary site plans <br />contingent on the applicant receiving the necessary variances. He advised staff recommends <br />approval of the variance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Board of Adjustment meeting at 7:36 p.m. in <br />order to conduct the public hearing. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 7:36 p.m. <br /> <br />Citizen Inpu_t, <br /> <br />There was none. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Board Member Watson, to close the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Brauer, Jeffrey, Van Scoy and <br />Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Johnson and Shepherd. <br /> <br />Board Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the Board of Adjustment meeting back to order at 7:36 p.m. <br /> <br />Board Member Van Scoy inquired how shared parking actually benefits the City. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon replied with separate owners and separate <br />lots there is the need to deal with cross easements and feuding on prime parking spaces. One lot <br />being under control by one entity makes some of those issues go away. There will be an overall <br />master plan regarding the shared parking that will be controlled by one entity versus three or four <br />property owners working out cross easements. There are also other issues, such as the <br />maintenance of the shared parking areas, upkeep and snowplowing. They can all be done, but it <br />makes it a little easier and manageable to do it this way with one big lot that multiple people are <br />using. <br /> <br />Board Member Van Scoy asked if a PUD process will be used. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon responded in the negative and explained <br />this would be a variance. <br /> <br />Board Member Van Scoy clarified they are looking at the possibility of using this as a blueprint <br />for future development. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon replied that was the discussion at the last <br />Commission meeting; that they may want to look at what they want to do in the Town Center <br />District with multiple buildings. He is not sure if everyone weighed in on that. In the interim the <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/August 5, 2004 <br /> Page 9 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.