Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 4 - Seotember 10, 2004 ZB. <br />~ , <br /> <br />see also: Nicolerte v. Caruso, 315 FSupp.2d 710 (2003). <br />see also: Unired Anists Theatre CirCLlit Inc. v. Township of Warrington, <br />3]6 F3d 392 (2003). <br /> <br />Vested Right - Sign company re<:eiy~s state permits for unzoned land <br />After compla.ints, local government seeks tv zone it, issue stop work order <br />Cirarion: lvlerTOpo!itan Developmenr Commission of iY!arion Counry v. <br />Pinnacle iviedia LLC, Coun of Appeals of Indiana, 5th Disr., No. 49A05-0309- <br />CV-465 (2004) <br /> <br />INDIANA (06/30/04) - Pinnacle iYfedia LLC W3.S engaged in the business of <br />erecting outdoor advertising signs. It sought to build two signs near a major <br />highway. <br />Because the 3.rcJ. was unzoned, local authorities told Pinnacle it was re- <br />quired only to obtain any necessary permits from the state. After obtaining <br />.. ~:rrnits for the first two signs, Pinnacle applied for penmts to build 15 more 00 <br />the unzooed strip of land. <br />When neighbors complained, local officials decided to zone the parcel. <br />l\Iter zoning it, the local government issued stop work orders for the signs. <br />Pinnacle sued, and the court mled in its favor. <br />The commission appealed. <br />DECJSION; AffirmeD. <br />Pinnacle had vested rights in the permits and signJ. <br />A property owner had the ability to survey the zoning laws as they existed <br />at a particular time and determine with certainty which permitting authorities <br />required an application. <br />Once a propeny owner applied for the relevant budding permits under the <br />prevailing zoning la\.\l5, the owner's rights vested against other government units. <br />that subsequently attempted to intervene by enacting laws [0 assert jurisdiction <br />lmd permitting requirements over the subject matter of pending permit applications. <br />see also: Steuben Counry v. Family Developers Limired, 753 NE.2d 693 (2001). <br />see also: Brademas v. Smuh Bend Communiry School Corporation, 783 NE. <br />2d 745 (2003). <br /> <br />Contempt - Court finds city in contempt for moratorium <br />Court had ordered if not lO enact height and densiry initiatives <br /> <br />CirOizon: eiT:) oj~ Cocoa Beach. v. ~/aC{IIIon BirJC}l inc., Cour! of' ~4ppeCll o~f' <br /> <br />l~lori,d{I. 5rh Dis~., i-\'/O. 5D03-::355 {2(04) <br /> <br />FLOR1DA \ ,0''::>04, - V;lcHlon Beach Inc. (;hal1enged a vocer-initiated refer- <br />~ndUG1 [0 be pLlced cn the lCC:ll ballot thac \;vould change the mQXilTIUm building <br /> <br />heigbc and der1s(T~/. <br /> <br />l~: :zoo::.! CUlnJ2n ::jbljs~jnq~{cuo. ~nv "sorcGur.:lon _os ,:;ronlDH8d. ,=or .110r& .nicrmaHon :)Jease ,;311 :6; -;. 5!..~2.;)O~8. <br /> <br />108 <br />