My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/07/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/07/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:34:23 AM
Creation date
10/1/2004 10:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/07/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Residential in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City Council. She indicated because <br />of this, the applicant must apply for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik advised Staff recommends approval of the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property's Land Use designation from <br />Medium Density Residential to Places to Shop. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated he is aware this is across from the Holiday Store, and during the <br />approval of that business they gave serious consideration on whether that was appropriate in <br />proximity to the residential zoning to the east. He asked if they were to change this to places to <br />shop, what would the potential land uses be. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik indicated it could be restaurants, retail, professional <br />services, office building, banks, etc. She stated it could not be a car lot or an R V dealer. A <br />convenience store would also be pennitted, however now a Conditional Use Permit would be <br />required for gas sales. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if they required a proposed development with a comprehensive plan <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated they usually do, but recently there were others <br />where they were not required to submit a concept plan because it was reviewing rezonings that <br />occurred with the 200 I Comp Plan.. . <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br />Chairperson Nixt opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. <br /> <br />Meagan Blakely, 5041 Xkimo Court stated this property is right out her front door. She <br />indicated she has concerns about quality of life next to whatever could potentially go there. She <br />stated she needs to know more about how much space there needs to be between residential and <br />commercial properties, especially since there is no street separating the lots. She added ambient <br />light would change the atmosphere of the area. <br /> <br />Ms. Blakely also questioned what it would do to their property values. She asked if the <br />commercial property would need to access the property from Xkimo or if they could access it <br />from Highway 47, because commercial property would create more traffic in the cul~de-sac. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated when there are commercial developments next <br />to residential zoning there are extra setbacks and screening required. She indicated as to the <br />property values she would suggest Ms. Blakely call the County Assessor to see if there are any <br />other situations like that that they can reference. She added access would be offXkimo Street or <br />Xkimo COUl1, not off Highway 47. <br /> <br />Ms. Blakely stated there are many small children in that cul-de-sac, which is also a concern with <br />more traffic. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 2, 2004 <br />Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br />P6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.