My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/12/17
Ramsey
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2010's
>
2017
>
01/12/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:47:11 AM
Creation date
4/27/2017 11:47:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Riley asked if the Planning Commission had any comments for the EDA to consider. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the Planning Commission discussion with <br /> the EDA. He noted staff believed this project, a daycare, would fit within the permitted use of the <br /> area. The major concern was carving out a smaller piece to develop. The Planning Commission <br /> does not prefer this location from an overall masterplan perspective and felt there were better sites <br /> for this. <br /> Member Burandt asked what the vision was for the parcel. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the site with the Board. <br /> Member Hardin asked how large the parcel was across from the three acres and if the zoning was <br /> consistent with the zoning on that parcel. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated he did not know the exact size but that it would <br /> be the same zoning. <br /> Member Hardin asked if it was still flexible for retail across the street. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated there would still be available retail use. <br /> Member Riley thought they needed to concentrate on Yolite Street right now because if they decide <br /> it has to be built, they are locking the remnant parcel in. He asked if the storm sewer was being <br /> used or if it is just in the ground. <br /> Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama assumed it was in use but was not <br /> positive. <br /> Member Williams arrived at 7:51 a.m. <br /> Member Riley thought Yolite Street was the first thing they needed to make a decision on, which <br /> in turn will dictate other things to occur. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated the Planning Commission also thought there <br /> could be one building with multiple levels but that would need to be discussed with the building <br /> department. <br /> Member Riley stated in regards to Yolite Street, it does not need to be there. For traffic flow he <br /> believed it does not need to be there at all. In an emergency, there are private drives along with a <br /> break-thru in the ramp that can be used so Yolite Street is not necessary as a City maintained street. <br /> It could be a private drive. <br /> Member Williams stated she was still concerned about the remnant parcel but wants to see <br /> something happen on that site and if there is an eager buyer then she was confident with City Staff <br /> to make it work. <br /> Economic Development Authority/January 12, 2017 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.