Laserfiche WebLink
Boar([ Member <br /> <br />introduced the ~:bllowing resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION//04-10- <br /> <br />A RI!;SOLUTiON DENYING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO THE MINIMUM <br />STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS IN THE R-1 RESIDENTIAL RU 'RAL <br />DEVELOPING DISTRICT · <br /> <br /> WIIEILEAS, Job2~ Rowe, hereinafter referred to as "Applicants", have pk-operly applied <br />for a Board of Adjustment variance to the minimum street frontage or lot width requirement in <br />the R-1 Residential District of the Rural Developing area for in order to subdivide the property <br />generally lcnown as 65_30 Green Valley Road and legally described as follows: <br /> <br />The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 32, <br />Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> <br />(the "Subject Property") <br /> <br /> WIIEFO;AS, the Board of Adjustment met on October 7, 2004, conducted the public <br />hearing and adopted Resolution #04-10-__ adopting findings of fact related to the request for <br />variance. <br /> <br /> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br />OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows <br /> <br />Based on Findings of Fact #__ <br />requirement is hereby denied. <br /> <br />, a variance to the minimum street frontage or lot width <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution ,,vas duly seconded by Board Member <br />__, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted.against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the l;ollowing were absent: <br /> <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey Board of Adjustment this <br />the day of June, 2003. <br /> <br />CITY OF RAMSEY: <br />[3,/: <br /> <br />Board o 1" Adjustment Chairperson <br /> <br />City' Clerk <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br /> <br />