My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/09/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 05/09/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:32:24 PM
Creation date
5/12/2017 3:18:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/09/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
524
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Kuzma said the original plan was dated and this Plan is progressive, flexible, <br />and market -driven to help define the vision. <br />Councilmember Riley agreed the Plan is market -driven and that two areas of concern is changing <br />floor -to -area -ration (FAR) in response to market requests and parking structures. He said the <br />market will not dictate that and if we push structured parking the result will be the City <br />constructing a ramp instead of developers. He said flexibility and strict adherence to FAR does <br />not sound very flexible and should be reviewed. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill said staff will work with the Planning Commission <br />to acknowledge community impacts and market, adding it is important to balance between <br />requirements and what will work. He said a ramp is not a new topic and this Plan will not solve <br />all parking concerns but we want to study how parking could work in order to communicate the <br />benefits to developers. <br />Chairperson Bauer said he was concerned that if we have a vision then it should be followed. He <br />said the Planning Commission wanted to stress the need for shared parking so it was <br />incorporated into each of the developments. He acknowledged structured parking may require <br />some City dollars as developers will not pay for an entire ramp if they only use a portion. <br />Planning Commissioner Anderson said we should consider shared parking from the beginning <br />for cost sharing as he does not want to see us bottleneck with nowhere to park. He said we have <br />to consider either constructing higher or allowing for the capability to go up if needed. <br />Councilmember Riley said he wished we had the problem of not having enough space because <br />we have nothing but space. He said structured parking costs $50/square foot and the market will <br />not support that because land costs now range between $6-$12/square foot. He commented that <br />shared parking with Northgate Church works well. <br />Chairperson Bauer agreed, stating a theater generally uses parking in the evenings and could be <br />another shared parking option. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill said it is fair to assume proformas, ROI, tax base, <br />etc. to identify the funding gap and frame any vision in that context. <br />Acting Mayor LeTourneau commented that flexibility will be important. <br />Councilmember Williams asked if staff wants structured parking studies included in the Plan. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill said the Plan is a broad policy document and based <br />off this direction we will lay out system plans, one being parking districts and/or parking ramps, <br />and that staff is looking for feedback to kick off system plans, including parking strategies. He <br />said this direction will establish how we make requests and bring contracts forward. <br />City Council Work Session / April 25, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.