Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Bauer said their intent was that the Plan needs to include more than just The COR <br /> and that it be realistic as big box stores will more likely locate on Highway 10 than The COR. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill said staff will work to find a better way to phrase the <br /> statement or include a reference on the map instead. <br /> Councilmember Shryock said she would like to see a road map and flexibility so when we <br /> remove some verbiage and review modular developments or districts or zones they can be moved <br /> around. She said she would like to see more timeless architecture references so development <br /> does not become outdated. <br /> Councilmember Johns agreed any development will be market driven but said the importance of <br /> the Plan is to help create what development is driven to Ramsey. <br /> Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood said the Parks Board liked the <br /> Interim Plan as it incorporates a future parks plan that will help market The COR. He said the <br /> Board will further review the Plan in May and that their feedback will be shared with the <br /> Council. <br /> The consensus of the Council was to continue with the process as outlined for the COR Interim <br /> Development Plan. <br /> 2.02: Receive Update on Park Dedication Credit Discussion for Riverstone Addition <br /> Located Near Bunker Lake Boulevard and Puma Street; Case of Capstone Homes <br /> (Project No. 17-106) <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report, noting the purpose of this <br /> case is to receive an update on a request for Park Dedication Credit as part of the proposed <br /> Riverstone Addition. He explained the Council is not being asked to make a final decision but to <br /> hear an update on recent progress and talking points in advance of official review in May and <br /> June. He reviewed the key policy topics, including the Master Parks Plan Update, the existing <br /> parks CIP, the Riverstone Addition Policy Document, the Planned Unit Development, housing <br /> goals, and other development scenarios. He said staff is seeking policy direction for park <br /> dedication credit stating the developer is requesting $475,000 as credit to create a smaller pocket <br /> park maintained by a homeowner's association (HOA) with a trail connection as part of Lake <br /> Itasca Greenway. Community Development Director Gladhill said staff has held discussions <br /> with the developer regarding their request and said if approved this action would have impacts <br /> on the future Lake Itasca Park whether reduced or delayed improvements. <br /> Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood reinforced trigger points when the <br /> project would start, stating $29 million of park/trails have been identified with $2 million in the <br /> park trust fund that should be focused instead on community parks, splash pad and other items in <br /> The COR that would also serve this subdivision. <br /> Councilmember Riley asked if we suggested pocket parks to the developer. <br /> City Council Work Session/April 25, 2017 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />