My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/13/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2004
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/13/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 1:37:10 PM
Creation date
10/6/2004 12:46:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
10/13/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Gromberg stated at some point the Ramsey Revolving Loan Fund needs to be funded so <br />it gets to a point where it is a reasonable size to do something with. <br /> <br />The consensus of the EDA was to utilize an EDA levy, rather than an HRA levy. <br /> <br />Economic Development / TIF Specialist Sullivan reviewed land acquisition expenses in the <br />budget. Member Steffen inquired about the $19,079 expense designated for the Sauter purchase <br />by Sharp. Economic Development / TIF Specialist Sullivan noted this would be the Sunfish <br />Gateway Project by McKinley Street and Sunfish Lake Boulevard. The EDA received funds <br />from selling that property to Dennis Sharp. <br /> <br />Economic Development / TIF Specialist Sullivan advised in order to address future needs for <br />land acquisition and participate actively in future economic and redevelopment opportunities, it <br />would be prudent for the EDA to seek additional funding and to recommend to City Council to <br />levy the amount of $293,739.27 utilizing the EDA levy. He inquired if the Board would like to <br />include training expenses in the budget. Member Kiefer indicated there should be the <br />opportunity for the Board to look at what other Economic Developments have done in terms of <br />creating incubators and potential hotbeds for employment and development. This would assist <br />them in developing a plan or strategy for this group. He noted the work of the EDA is very <br />nebulous to most people and there is a very steep training curve. It would be good to have some <br />training on the benefits of being proactive or of being reactive. <br /> <br />Economic Development / TIF Specialist Sullivan indicated it would be beneficial for the Board <br />to act on opportunities to visit sites as suggested by Member Kiefer. Member Kiefer explained if <br />they arc very proactive with training and they position themselves properly with the bridge and <br />Highway 10, they may be able to bring in some Fortune 500 companies. With the improvement <br />of the highway there will be more incentives for those kinds of companies to locate up this way, <br />and if the City gets ahead of the curve and plans accordingly there could be nice opportunities in <br />the community. <br /> <br />Member Gromberg suggested $2,000 be eliminated from miscellaneous operating supplies and <br />added to training. Associate Planner Wald expressed concern with reducing miscellaneous <br />expenses. She explained Business Network Meetings, Business Tours, and the Business <br />Connection are examples of projects that utilize funds from miscellaneous funds. <br /> <br />The consensus of the EDA was to direct staff to specify expenses for projects that draw funds <br />from miscellaneous operating supplies in the budget. <br /> <br />Member Gromberg expressed concern with the public perception of a 30 percent levy increase, <br />from the $200,000 levy in 2004 to a $293,000. <br /> <br />Member Strommen noted with the $233,306.42 levy that was approved at the last EDA meeting <br />the result was approximately $29 per household on a $200,000 home. If a levy is recommended <br />over this amount there should be specific projects called out for consideration by the Council. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/September 8, 2004 <br /> Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.