My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/06/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/06/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:27:53 AM
Creation date
5/23/2017 10:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/06/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
any project drastically effects project costs, and therefore has a direct effect on the purchase <br />agreement negotiation. Additionally, this feedback will help Stone Brook with providing <br />direction to their architects/ engineers that will formally design the project (and prepare for <br />official applications). Therefore, any preliminary <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Bauer understood the sentiments of each group that has reviewed this request was <br />that Yolite Street should be connected and that Mr. Johnson supported shared financing. He <br />requested further information from staff on the benefits of this connection being public or <br />private. <br />Assistant City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama offered a definition for a <br />public road and explained sidewalks and lights would be required, which would be more costly. <br />He indicated a private drive option would be less costly and noted the standards would be <br />negotiable. He reported the City would pay 60% and the developer would pay 40% for a public <br />roadway. If the road were to develop in a private manner, the expense would be negotiable and <br />staff anticipated this could be split 50/50. He explained that if the road were developed as a <br />private drive, it would remain open to the public. <br />Chairperson Bauer questioned if a private road made more sense for the remnant lot. <br />Assistant City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated this would make <br />more sense for the remnant lot as this would allow for additional width. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if the future sale of the remnant lot would be improved if the <br />roadway were public versus private. <br />Assistant City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama believed this issue would <br />have to be further vetted. He anticipated that a private drive would reduce the entry costs for a <br />future developer, while also maintaining more of the land. <br />Commissioner VanScoy discussed the importance of the Yolite connection for users of the train. <br />For this reason, he supported a public street. <br />Commissioner Nosan questioned who would maintain the roadway if it were private. <br />Assistant City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated the maintenance <br />would be negotiable. <br />Commissioner Anderson expressed concern with a private road and recommended the <br />connection be public to allow for proper access. <br />Michael Johnson, Stone Brook Children's Academy, introduced himself to the Commission and <br />stated he would be one of the owners of Stone Brook. <br />Planning Commission/March 2, 2017 <br />Page 9 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.