Laserfiche WebLink
9. That the standard side yard setback for accessory buildings in the R-1 (MUSA) district is six <br />(6) feet. <br />10. That the accessory structure has already been constructed within the required corner side yard <br />setback. <br />11. That the property has public right-of-way on three sides of the property severely inhibiting the <br />amount of buildable area on the lot. <br />12. That there is a six (6) foot privacy fence in place that screens the majority of the accessory <br />structure from view. <br />13. That the plight is/is not due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. <br />14. That the plight was/was not created by the Applicant. <br />15. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not alter the locality's essential character. <br />16. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br />property. <br />17. That, if granted, the variance will/will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited <br />in the applicable zoning district. <br />18. That, if granted, the variance will/will not increase the congestion on the public street. <br />19. That, if granted, the variance will/will not adversely impact the degree of public health, safety <br />and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. <br />20. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not permit standards that are lower than those required <br />by state law. <br />21. That, if granted, the variance will/will not diminish established property values within the <br />neighborhood. <br />22. That, if granted, the variance requested is/is not the minimum variance necessary to accomplish <br />the intended purpose of the Applicants. <br />23. That, if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicants any special privilege that is <br />denied to the owners of other land in the same district. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />RESOLUTION #17-04-081 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />