My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/06/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/06/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:27:53 AM
Creation date
5/23/2017 10:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/06/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin February 25, 2017 I Volume 11 I Issue 4 <br />portunity to respond to evidence presented against her through the pre-. <br />sentation of rebuttal testimony and through the submission of written <br />questions which could then be asked by the Board; and any such re- <br />striction on cross-examination had been rescinded for the remaining <br />hearings. Moreover, the court found "forty years of precedent" showed <br />that boards are not required to provide the opportunity for cross- <br />examination at every local administrative hearing. <br />The court additionally found that Beal's bias claim failed because <br />she failed to rebut "the presumption that the Board members acted with <br />honesty and integrity." The court found that it was only at "informal <br />negotiations" that one Board member had said the building should be <br />"condemned." Whereas, at the formal hearings, the Board members <br />had stated on the record that they had not prejudged the case, and they <br />spent months hearing and deliberating before rendering their final <br />decision. <br />See also: Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 96 S. Ct. 893, 47L. Ed. <br />2d 18 (1976). <br />See also: Hale v. Petit, 438A.2d 226 (Me. 1981). <br />Case Note: <br />The appellate court also concluded that the Board's decision on Beal's <br />structure was supported by substantial evidence. <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />INDIANA <br />Under a newly proposed bill, cities and towns in Indiana would be <br />prohibited from banning short-term rentals (such as Airbnb rentals). <br />House Bill 1131 "[s]pecifies requirements for local unit of government <br />regulation of short term rental of residential property." The bill would <br />allow regulation of short-term rentals only for certain, specified <br />purposes, including: protection of the public's health and safety related <br />to fire and building safety, sanitation, transportation, traffic control, and <br />pollution control —"if enforcement [of such regulations] does not pro- <br />hibit the use of a property as a short term rental." <br />Source: Indiana General Assembly; https://iga.in.gov <br />MASSACHUSETTS <br />Boston Mayor Marty Walsh is reportedly "looking to expand ten- <br />© 2017 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.