Laserfiche WebLink
5) That as part of the reconstruction of 166th Ave NW, the City installed five (5) sets of utility <br />stubs to the Subject Property. <br />6) That the Applicant is only proposing three (3) lots to minimize deviations from the lot <br />depth standard. <br />7) That the Environmental Policy Board reviewed the request at their March 20, 2017 <br />meeting. <br />8) That the location of the existing dwelling on Lot 2 restricts the Applicant's ability to adjust <br />lot lines to reduce or eliminate the encroachment into the sixty (60) foot by 100 foot <br />buildable area box. <br />9) That both lots still meet the spirit and intent of the lot depth standard as they do have <br />buildable area available to accommodate typical homeowner improvements, such as a deck <br />and/or a detached accessory building. <br />10) That there are significant areas of wetland and floodway encumbering the Subject Property. <br />11) That there is additional buildable area beyond the 60'x100' area on each lot. <br />12) That economic circumstances alone do/do not create the practical difficulties. <br />13) That the plight is/is not due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. <br />14) That the plight is/is not created by the Applicant. <br />15) That, if granted, the variance will/will not alter the locality's essential character. <br />16) That, if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br />adjacent property. <br />17) That, if granted, the variance will/will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited <br />in the applicable zoning district. <br />18) That, if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably increase the congestion on the <br />public street. <br />19) That, if granted, the variance will/will not adversely impact the degree of public health, <br />safety and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. <br />20) That, if granted, the variance will/will not diminish established property values within the <br />neighborhood. <br />21) That, if granted, the variance requested is/is not the minimum variance necessary to <br />accomplish the intended purpose of the Applicant. <br />Resolution #17-04-077 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />