Laserfiche WebLink
points for the project. As part of the improvements, the Applicant will be eliminating the existing, southern access <br />point, creating an egress only access point approximately in the center of the new lot, and creating an ingress/egress <br />access point at the northern boundary of the new lot. City Staff has submitted the plan set to Anoka County <br />Highway staff also for formal comment but as of the writing of this case, have not received comments back. Based <br />on earlier discussions with the Applicant, the northern access point will straddle the property boundary between <br />Lots 1 & 2, which will require a cross -access easement. There is also an existing driveway serving another lot that is <br />to be modified to connect with the proposed northern access to eliminate two access points directly adjacent to one <br />another. <br />The submittal did not include any building elevations. At this time, it is unknown specifically what the proposed <br />exterior wall finishes will be. Staff will continue to work with the Applicant regarding exterior finishes and seek <br />color elevations prior to bringing forward to the City Council. <br />Due to both the expansion of parking area and the building, additional landscaping is required. Presently, there is no <br />proposed landscaping with the plan set. The Staff Review Letter outlines the minimum requirements for the <br />Applicant and Staff will continue to work with them to ensure the minimum standards are met. <br />Alternatives. <br />Alternative 1. Recommend approval of the CUP, Minor Plat, and Site Plan contingent upon compliance with the <br />Staff Review Letter. The church has been operating in this location for a number of years with no known issues. <br />The proposed building expansion complies with all building setbacks as does the plat. Staff supports this alternative. <br />Alternative 2. Do not recommend approval of the CUP, Minor Plat and Site Plan. As long as the revisions outlined <br />in the Staff Review Letter are incorporated into the plan set, Staff sees no reason not to approve these requests. Staff <br />does not support this alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approving the requested CUP, Minor Plat, and Site Plan. <br />Action: <br />Motion to recommend City Council adopt Resolution #17-05-101 approving a CUP, Minor Plat and Site Plan <br />associated with a proposed expansion of Trott Brook Hall, subject to approval as to legal form by the City Attorney. <br />DRAFT Resolution #17-05-101 <br />Site Location Map <br />Preliminary Plat <br />Plan Set <br />Staff Review Letter <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill Tim Gladhill 04/28/2017 02:48 PM <br />Form Started By: Chris Anderson Started On: 04/27/2017 12:00 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 04/28/2017 <br />