My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/04/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/04/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:28:11 AM
Creation date
5/23/2017 10:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/04/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Traditional Single-Family/Small Lot Single -Family and Villa Lots <br />1A• • i•Iu ii, i <br />Attached and Detached Townhomes <br />Lot size <br />Minimum density (net) <br />Maximum density (net) <br />Lot width <br />Building setback from public street right- <br />of-way <br />Building setback from private street <br />measured from back of curb <br />Building setback from exterior <br />development boundary line <br />None <br />3.0 <br />7.0 <br />None <br />25 feet <br />25 feet <br />30 feet <br />25 feet (detached) <br />Minimum separation between buildings, 20 feet <br />including any appurtenances thereto (i.e., 15 feet (detached) <br />patios, decks) <br />Parking node setback from exterior 30 feet <br />development boundary line <br />Parking node setback from structure 15 feet <br />Maximum lot coverage 35% <br />Maximum building height (measured from 35 feet <br />mean ground level to mean gable) <br />Accessory structure setback (measured 30 feet <br />from the development boundary line) <br />Maximum number of units per structure 81 (detached) <br />Open space required 40% general open space 10% of which must <br />be identifiable community space <br />The only deficiency in the above table would be the minimum separation between buildings. The <br />Planning Commission and City Council have already seen this project in concept, and appeared <br />generally supportive of the overall approach. The PUD appears to be an appropriate tool in this <br />instance. <br />Continued on next page. <br />It is our mission to work together to responsibly grow our community, and to provide quality, cost- <br />effective ective and efficient government services. <br />Riverstone Addition Planning Division Review April 28, 2017 (Preliminary Plat) <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.