Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Comprehensive Plan components. He reviewed the goals of the Comprehensive Plan Steering <br />Committee. There has been more use out of the larger community parks rather than the pocket <br />parks. The community has indicated they would prefer the larger community parks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sis referred to the underpass on Alpine Park and asked if there is data available <br />indicating this would be helpful to the wildlife. Mr. Riverblood stated there has not been a large <br />number of wildlife deaths along Alpine Drive. This would not be the primary reason for the <br />underpass. The primary purpose would be safety for young people. A signalized intersection <br />would cost the same amount of money but crossing under the road may be safer. Commissioner <br />Sis was concerned the property would be isolated as far as emergency vehicles. <br /> <br />Commissioner Logan noted there are many options for this area and appreciated bringing in the <br />residents to the planning process. The developer would like to receive Park Dedication credits for <br />the open spaces areas but the Commission must balance between past practices, policies and how <br />the whole community would be in the best served. Mr. Riverblood stated the water-centric park <br />features are costed out today in excess of $6M. The splash pad would be a community-wide <br />destination and accessible to families that may live in the project being proposed. <br /> <br />Chair Bennett stated the consensus of the Commission is that where staff is looking to with <br />respect to the allocation of Park Dedication proceeds appears in line with where the Commission <br />would like to see, including not investing in pocket parks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sis asked about a diagonal greenway through the City serving a dual purpose to <br />increase bike traffic to the City parks. Mr. Riverblood stated the trail and greenway would not be <br />redundant and would serve residents for different purposes. They would be complimentary and <br />have completely different character. <br /> <br />Commissioner Troy asked if an over-pass would be a substitute for the under-pass. Mr. <br />Riverblood stated bridges are much more expensive than box culvert under-pass. Roughly <br />speaking, a bridge would cost ten times more than an under-pass. All the preliminary engineering <br />has not been researched to see if the grade would allow for an under-pass. Mr. Riverblood stated <br />a sketch plan will come back before the Commission. <br /> <br />6. COMMISSION/STAFF INPUT <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood provided the following updates: <br /> <br />Update on the Comprehensive Plan Process Chair Bennett reported the City has established an <br />ad-hoc Comprehensive Plan Update Steering Committee. Once every ten years, the City is <br />required by Minnesota Statute 473 to update its Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Aside from the <br />demographics, and land use vision. In order <br />systems such as transportation, housing, economic development, natural resources, and <br />parks/open space to name a few, now is an appropriate time to update the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Steering Committee has met twice so far on the project to set the stage and agree on a <br />Park and Recreation Commission/January 12, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />