My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 05/25/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2017
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 05/25/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:14:29 PM
Creation date
5/25/2017 11:23:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
05/25/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
like the all-inclusive developer that apparently, people did not like so they went with a traditional <br />broker which was frustrating also. He thought it was a great idea that they try to figure out what <br />they really want. He stated he is a fan of pushing this idea to figure out what they want to do. <br />He stated the City is not a developer and he would like to see a real developer get involved. <br />Chairperson Steffen stated he did not get the impression of the three developers that came to talk <br />to them were really interested in buying the land or building anything on the land. <br />Member Williams indicated she did not think the developers were ever asked. <br />Chairperson Steffen stated he did not feel any excitement that they wanted to do anything in <br />Ramsey so how can they partner with them if they do not see the same vision as the EDA does. <br />Member Williams thought that was an important consideration, because one of the things that <br />she is looking for is a partner. She wants someone who is as excited as she is about Ramsey, and <br />that comes in with ideas that the EDA have not thought about. She stated as a Councilmember <br />she would like to see coming out of this body what types of compensation structures they would <br />be comfortable with, and what would they not be comfortable with. <br />Member Hardin thought every one of the groups they talked to had pointed out their barriers and <br />they have to deal with barriers. The EDA has to decide how they want to market the property <br />and then find someone who can help them to do it correctly. <br />Member Burandt stated when he thinks of partner he thinks of invest money with them versus <br />hire. He stated if there are barriers they need to acknowledge it and try to work through it. <br />4.05: QUICK CASE: Appoint Ad -Hoc Subcommittee Members to Update Housing Plans <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated the purpose of this case is to appoint a <br />member of the EDA to an ad -hoc housing sub -committee to update the City's Housing Plan. A <br />Housing Plan is a required component of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Two Planning <br />Commissioners have been appointed from the Planning Commission. The City Council <br />requested that one EDA member be appointed. The group is following a three -member structure <br />that was utilized in 2012 to update housing plans and policies. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the staff report. <br />Chairperson Steffen asked if anyone was interested in taking this on. <br />Member Brunt stated he would be interested in finding out more about it, to see if he could make <br />a contribution to it. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill thought any member on the EDA would be an asset <br />to the sub -committee. <br />Economic Development Authority/April 13, 2017 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.