My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/23/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 05/23/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:33:01 PM
Creation date
5/25/2017 11:36:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/23/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of bidding, administration, permitting (if any) as well as construction administration. The <br />park construction agreement (DA) will be a reimbursable project, with the developer <br />paying all cash Park Dedication owed, with the City issuing associated payment for each <br />improvement as they are completed and accepted — for a total not -to -exceed amount of <br />$275,300, <br />b. 0 & M impacts: Development Agreement specifies homeowner's association provides all <br />mowing services, fertilization and fall or spring leaf pick-up. City forces provide all other <br />maintenance. <br />c. Lake Itasca Park (development initiated in 3-10 years) <br />i. Parking lot (and potential one -leg of round -a -bout) <br />ii. Canoe/Kayak kiosk <br />iii. Pier with seating at lake (existing CIP project) <br />Staff is requesting a recommendation from the Commission either this evening or on June 9, <br />2017. The Community Park should provide the neighborhood park functions as well as the <br />community park functions. The mini park proposed at Outlot C will be of primary benefit to the <br />Riverstone residents. Staff is Option 2. Mr. Riverblood reviewed the breakdown <br />of the $275,300 not -to -exceed Park Dedication credit amount. <br />The differences between the original proposal and Option 2 were reviewed. The lots would be 65 <br />feet wide rather than 80 feet wide. <br />Mr. Steve Bona reviewed the drawing and provided background information on Capstone <br />Homes, and the proposed Riverstone subdivision. The planning process began many months ago. <br />They are trying to get final plat approval in June -July timeframe and start construction in July. <br />The park would be part of Phase I of the project. The pi0peity is zoned R-2 which is meant for <br />the smaller lots. A consultant was used to help plan the development as far as lot sizes, home <br />sizes, pricing, etc. There will be a homeowner's association. These are not standard single family <br />lots. There will be three different project types. Some of the lots are 50 feet wide. Mr. Bona feels <br />there is a need for a park close to the homes. When completed there will be 300 units. The <br />neighborhood was designed with the park in mind. The original proposal made to the City <br />included three greenspace areas/parks. One greenspace was removed from the proposal on the <br />south side of the p.op .�y . The park will cost $483,000 to build and the develop... v CuN requesting <br />park credit for $300,000. The developer will provide the improvements to the park area. The pad <br />will cost $146,000. The credit for the trail was $182,000. $867,000 in total improvement costs <br />and the developer is requesting $483,000 in park credits. <br />Acting Chair Sis asked what benefit it is for the City to be involved in the mini park (Outlot C). <br />Park and Recreation Commission/May 11, 2017 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.