My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/13/17
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2010's
>
2017
>
04/13/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2017 12:00:27 PM
Creation date
5/25/2017 12:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further discussion: Member Riley stated this group has been discussing this for a time and the <br />fact that this will be moving forward is a step in the right direction. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Steffen, Members Skaff, Burandt, Brunt, Hardin, <br />Riley, and Williams. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />4.02: MOU: Arterial Infrastructure to Serve Ramsey’s Future Business Park & <br />Capstone Homes Development <br /> <br />Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Member Hardin asked if there was a sunset clause for the HRA money or did it go on forever. <br /> <br />Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama indicated he was not aware of any <br />sunset on this and it is the EDA’s money to use at their discretion. <br /> <br />Member Hardin asked if the money was used mostly for commercial property or residential <br />property. <br /> <br />Economic Dev. Mgr/Assistant City Administrator Brama stated it was for everything. <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Bona, Capstone Homes stated they do not have any further comments to make but <br />would be happy to answer questions from the EDA. <br /> <br />Member Riley stated a comment was made the last time the City Council looked at this about not <br />having a good inclination to option A, general bonds, charging their existing residents an <br />increase in tax to bring in new residents and it did not feel like a great idea and would still be his <br />inclination. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen asked if the City Council was agreeable with the current MOA. <br /> <br />Member Riley thought they were. <br /> <br />Member Williams agreed with Member Riley and believed the Council was generally in favor. <br /> <br />Member Riley stated he would like to hear what the rest of the EDA thinks of this item. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen thought the MOA was similar to how it was laid out a month ago with <br />updates as suggested and it was agreeable last month and he felt the EDA was agreeable with it <br />this month as well and felt this was one of the last steps to get this project going. <br /> <br />Member Skaff stated he was in favor of this but he did not think they should be putting any <br />burden on existing homeowners. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/April 13, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.