Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Bona said it is for the most part but if agreement cannot be met the park will be removed and a <br />single-family lot being in its place. <br />Commissioner Trappen asked if the ponds could be relocated and the path be relocated which would <br />make more sense. He believes the children need a place to play. <br />Acting Chair Sis suggested an Option 3 where the developer would come back with a revised proposal <br />creating more of a corridor passageway. <br />Mr. Bona asked how wide the trail needs to be and Acting Chair Sis stated a more direct route would <br />appear wider. <br />Mr. Riverblood stated 35 feet would be appropriate for this location. <br />Mr. Bona stated there is a lot of information on the small piece of paper containing the drawing. <br />Commissioner Trappen would like to see a plan more realistic as to what was seen originally. <br />Mr. Bona stated the pond can be reviewed. The pond will be quite deep because material will need to <br />be removed to fill in the property. The wetlands will not be affected. Mr. Bona stated if the pond was <br />made smaller material would need to be brought onto the site and that is expensive. If basements are to <br />be on the homes the site needs to be raised. <br />Commissioner Tchuinkwa asked what is wrong with Option 1. <br />Mr. Bona stated the developer can't give park dedication funds AND build a park on the site. <br />Acting Chair Sis asked if the park could be just greenspace. <br />Mr. Bona stated the park is equivalent to 4 home lots. The owner of the company will build 4 homes if <br />there is not the park. <br />