My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/01/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/01/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:28:24 AM
Creation date
5/26/2017 9:11:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/01/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
338
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin May 25, 2017 I Volume 11 I Issue 10 <br />Vested Rights —After developer <br />seeks to develop property, town <br />rezones property <br />Property owner sues, claiming vested right in <br />zoning classification <br />Citation: McKee Family I, LLC City of Fitchburg, 2017 WI 34, 2017 <br />WL 1337663 (Wis. 2017) <br />WISCONSIN (04/12/17)—This case addressed the issue of whether a <br />property owner has a vested right in a zoning classification. It also ad- <br />dressed whether a zoning classification creates a contractual expectation <br />upon which a property owner may rely. <br />The Background/Facts: In 1989, McKee Brothers Partnership ("Mc- <br />Kee Brothers") dedicated approximately 60 acres of farmland to the City <br />of Fitchburg (the "City"). The farmland was donated to fulfill a park land <br />dedication requirement for a variety of McKee Brothers' projects, includ- <br />ing the property known as "Lots 53 and 54." Credit for the parkland al- <br />location was determined by a settlement agreement, which gave McKee <br />Brothers the right to build 600 dwelling units on a variety of lands it <br />owned. <br />McKee Brothers later transferred Lots 53 and 54 to MAF Develop- <br />ment, Inc. ("MAF"). The lots were zoned residential -medium ("R-M"), <br />but MAF applied for and received approval for rezoning to a planned <br />development district ("PDD") classification. <br />Pursuant to Wisconsin statutory law, municipalities could use a PDD <br />zoning classification to establish planned mixed -use developments with a <br />higher density than allowed under an R-M classification. (Wis. Stat. <br />§ 62.23.) The City's General Ordinances required that a property owner <br />seeking to develop PDD-zoned land first submit a general implementa- <br />tion plan ("GIP"). The General Ordinances further required that if the <br />GIP was approved, the property owner would then need to submit a <br />specific implementation plan ("SIP"), which, if approved, would be fol- <br />lowed by the property owner's building permit application. <br />Here, after receiving the PDD zoning classification, MAF submitted a <br />GIP for a multi -family housing development for "mature adults." The <br />City approved the GIP. <br />In 2007, MAF deeded Lots 53 and 54 to McKee Family I, LLC <br />("McKee"). McKee later entered into negotiations for JD McCormick <br />Company, LLC ("McCormick") to purchase Lots 53 and 54. At this point, <br />more than a decade had passed since the PDD zoning classification and <br />the GIP approval. The purchase agreement was contingent on Mc- <br />© 2017 Thomson Reuters 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.