Laserfiche WebLink
20. That the proposed use will be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. <br /> <br />21. That the lack of an owner-occupancy requirement on' the Subject Property may be <br /> detrimental to the character of the existing neighborhood. <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, <br />such as highways, streets, police and fire protection. <br /> <br />23. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br />public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not involve uses, activities and equipment that will be <br />detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive <br />production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing'findings of fact was duly seconded by <br />Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in <br />favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council <br />this the __ day of ,2004. <br /> <br />Mayor <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #04- - <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />