Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW OF AUTOMATED EDM; <br />CASE OF AUTOMATED EDM <br /> By: Megan Wald, Associate Planner <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Automated EDM currently operates their office, warehouse, and light manufacturing facility on <br />the property located at 6231 McKinley Street. Their existing facility is 12,576 square feet in size <br />and they are proposing to construct an 11,975 square foot warehouse/light manufacturing <br />addition. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br />d) <br /> <br />Site location map <br />Site plan <br />City Staff review letter dated October 8, 2004 <br />Development Permit <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />Site Plans do not require a public heating. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The existing facility is located in the E-1 Employment District and is considered a permitted use <br />in this district. The subject property is approximately 1.81 acres in size. Lot coverage for the <br />proposed project is approximately 31% (restricted to 45% under City Code). The addition meets <br />the required front, rear, side yard setbacks, and parking stall requirements. <br /> <br />'The exterior materials are proposing to consist of rock face'and smooth face concrete masonry <br />block, which complies with City Code standards. The landscape plan is acceptable. <br /> <br />The subject property and adjacent property currently drain to'a common pond, which occupies <br />area on both properties. The grading plan proposes installing an outlet from this common pond <br />into the 30 inch storm sewer located on the north side on McKinley Street. This storm sewer <br />discharges into the regional pond located at the east terminus of McKinley Street. The elevation <br />of this outlet will limit the 100 year event to an elevation of 863.4 which is 2.1 feet higher than <br />the catch basin inlet on the neighboring property's drive. This would cause water to pond briefly <br />in a 100 year event for a distance of 15 to 30 feet from the inlet. <br /> <br />The ponded area is not covered by a drainage and utility easement. The City Attorney has advised <br />that a drainage and utility easemen[ would be required if additional ponding is caused because of <br />the increased amount of impervious area. Although an outlet will be provided which may <br />.improve the current potential for flooding to the adjacent property, the high. water level from a <br />100 year event will cause temporary flooding of the adjacent property. Therefore as a condition <br />of approval a drainage and utility easement should be required from the adjacent property over <br />that portion of their 15roperty which woi~ld be inundated by a design storm event. <br /> <br /> <br />