Laserfiche WebLink
5) Consider Alternative Outlets from Regional Pond in Business Park 95 <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that the area south of CR 116, east of CR 57, and north of the <br />railroad tracks was developed as an industrial area beginning in 1995 and has becomes known as <br />Business Park 95 and its subsequent additions. Although there are a number of drainage areas <br />within the Park, the largest is located at the extreme southeast comer next to the City of Anoka. <br />Although there is significant ponding capacity, there presently is no positive outlet from this <br />watershed. With the addition of Mississippi Sub District No. 1 flowing to this regional pond, an <br />opportunity was created to establish a positive outlet for this system, by installing 476 of 24 inch <br />pipe to connect this ponding system to the 42 inch storm sewer on the west side at Sunfish Lake <br />Boulevard. Recently it was suggested that an overflow to the City of Anoka's storm water <br />system in their Business Enterprise Park might be a more economical alternative. The Business <br />Enterprise Park has a large outfall pipe to the Mississippi River. Staff has prepared cost <br />estimates for both these alternatives. The attached evaluations are limited to only the costs <br />associated with making the physical connection for each overflow alternative. At this point there <br />has been no formal discussions between Ramsey and Anoka, however, the City of Anoka does <br />have past practice of charging for the right to discharge into their storm sewer system. The <br />results of this analysis show the cost of discharging into Anoka's system to be $54,409 while the <br />cost of discharging into the Sunfish Lake storm sewer is $48,320. It is also important to note that <br />the Mississippi Sub Drainage District No. 1 has been credited $102,500 for this overflow. Staff <br />recommended that the storm sewer overflow connection to Sunfish Lake Boulevard continue to <br />be preserved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the City should work within their own boundaries. He <br />noted that last year there was a significant amount of rain and the pond in Business Park 95 did <br />not get real high. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that staff did do some research and if the Business Park 95 pond <br />were to flood over it would drain into the storm sewer system. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that he made the suggestion that the City research the feasibility of <br />making the connection to Anoka because that was initially the plan until the cost became quite <br />substantial. He hoped that possibly Anoka would negotiate the issue again, but based on the <br />costs presented it did not seem feasible. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted that the largest cost associated with the Anoka connection is the <br />restoration of the road. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if the cost estimates take into consideration the cost of acquiring <br />easement and that in order to proceed with option b the City will have to condemn property on <br />seven parcels. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson replied no, but noted that the cost estimates also do not include the <br />benefit that is being provided to the property owners. He explained that the City has recently had <br />discussions with the owner of Plants n Things who is looking at upgrading their business. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/May 20, 2003 <br /> Page 6 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />